{"kind":"evidence_file","company":{"id":"04b3a149-c3c1-4a68-9f4b-291c0f107edf","name":"FX-CAM Consulting and Advertisement Ltd","mergedInto":null},"asOf":"2026-10-25T00:48:36.042Z","asOfBasis":"instant","generatedAt":"2026-10-25T04:45:12.562Z","claims":[{"predicate":"name","value":"fx-cam consulting and advertisement","source":"ESMA Sanctions Register","sourceUrl":"https://registers.esma.europa.eu/publication/searchRegister?core=esma_registers_sanctions","sourceRecordId":"sn4303","observedAt":"2026-09-12T19:04:48.288Z","confirmedAt":"2026-10-23T12:00:05.950Z","validFrom":null,"validTo":null,"supersededLater":null},{"predicate":"primary_country","value":"MT","source":"ESMA Sanctions Register","sourceUrl":"https://registers.esma.europa.eu/publication/searchRegister?core=esma_registers_sanctions","sourceRecordId":"sn4303","observedAt":"2026-09-12T19:04:48.295Z","confirmedAt":"2026-10-23T12:00:05.953Z","validFrom":null,"validTo":null,"supersededLater":null}],"listings":[{"listingId":"4303","regime":"Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA)","program":"Debarment","state":"lifted","stateSince":"2026-09-12T19:14:37.309Z","recordedAt":"2026-09-12T19:04:48.315Z","designatedAt":"2016-03-08T00:00:00.000Z","validTo":null,"legalBasis":null,"reason":"On the 8 March 2016, the Malta Financial Services Authority (the MFSA or the Authority) has decided to cancel the Category 2 Investment Services Licence of FX-CAM Consulting and Advertisement Ltd (C57386), formerly Sensus Capital Markets Limited (Sensus or Company) in terms of the powers granted to the Authority under Article 7 of the Investment Services Act (ISA). Sensus was found in breach of: - Article 3(1) of the ISA and Standard Licence Condition (SLC) 1.13 of Part BI of the Investment Services Rules for Investment Services Providers (the Rules) for acting beyond its licence by dealing on own account when it was not licensed to do so; - SLCs 2.94, 2.95, 2.96 and 2.97 of the Rules in breach of the conflicts of interest requirements; - SLCs 1.06(m), 2.133, 2.134 and 2.141 of the Rules in relation to Sensus’ appointment of Introducing Brokers; - SLCs 2.83, 2.84 and 2.85 in relation to breaches relating to record keeping and retention of data; - SLCs 1.17(c), 1.17(e), 1.18(c) and 1.25 of the Rules with respect to breaches of the general organisational requirements; - SLCs 1.06(o) and 1.06(k) of the Rules for failure to notify the MFSA of material information concerning the Company; - SLCs 7.16 and 7.17 for failure to submit the annual audited financial statements and related documents within the required timeframes; - SLCs 1.04 and 1.22(b) of the Rules in relation to the appointment of company officials; - SLCs 1.02 and 1.09 of the Rules as well as Article 13 of the ISA for failure to cooperate in an open and honest manner with the MFSA and for providing inconsistent information to the MFSA; - SLC 1.20 of the Rules for providing the Company’s Compliance Officer with incomplete and /or misleading information; - SLC 1.06(b) of the Rules for failing to formally notify the MFSA about its change in registered address. The seriousness of Sensus’ above breaches is aggravated by a number of factors including the following: - The Company does not appear to have acted in good faith and has not shown any degree of openness or co-operation; rather, it has, on numerous occasions, attempted to conceal information and mislead the MFSA whilst undertaking activities that went beyond its licence; - There are circumstances suggesting that, Sensus consciously concealed information and/or attempted to mislead the MFSA; - The seriousness of the Company’s infringements may have potentially caused losses to its clients as well as impacting its financial soundness, particularly since it failed to obtain a licence to operate as a Category 3 licence holder, and hence was not subject to more onerous licence conditions, including those related to capital requirements and reporting obligations; and - Sensus engaged in these actions in a repeated and systematic manner and hence its infringements cannot be described as being isolated incidents. Sensus has therefore been found in breach of a number of requirements which are inter alia intended both to protect investors and to ensure the financial soundness of the Company. It should be noted that the MFSA decision to cancel Sensus’ licence shall not become operative until the expiration of the period within which an appeal lies, and if an appeal is made within such period, the decision shall become operative on the date of the decision of the Tribunal dismissing the appeal or the date on which the appeal is abandoned.","sanctionType":null,"documentUrl":"https://registers.esma.europa.eu/publication/details?core=esma_registers_sanctions&docId=sn4303","assertedBy":["ESMA Sanctions Register"],"sourceNow":"ESMA Sanctions Register"},{"listingId":"4303","regime":"Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA)","program":"MiFID","state":"in_force","stateSince":"2026-09-12T19:14:22.272Z","recordedAt":"2026-09-12T19:14:22.272Z","designatedAt":"2016-03-08T00:00:00.000Z","validTo":null,"legalBasis":null,"reason":"On the 8 March 2016, the Malta Financial Services Authority (the MFSA or the Authority) has decided to cancel the Category 2 Investment Services Licence of FX-CAM Consulting and Advertisement Ltd (C57386), formerly Sensus Capital Markets Limited (Sensus or Company) in terms of the powers granted to the Authority under Article 7 of the Investment Services Act (ISA). Sensus was found in breach of: - Article 3(1) of the ISA and Standard Licence Condition (SLC) 1.13 of Part BI of the Investment Services Rules for Investment Services Providers (the Rules) for acting beyond its licence by dealing on own account when it was not licensed to do so; - SLCs 2.94, 2.95, 2.96 and 2.97 of the Rules in breach of the conflicts of interest requirements; - SLCs 1.06(m), 2.133, 2.134 and 2.141 of the Rules in relation to Sensus’ appointment of Introducing Brokers; - SLCs 2.83, 2.84 and 2.85 in relation to breaches relating to record keeping and retention of data; - SLCs 1.17(c), 1.17(e), 1.18(c) and 1.25 of the Rules with respect to breaches of the general organisational requirements; - SLCs 1.06(o) and 1.06(k) of the Rules for failure to notify the MFSA of material information concerning the Company; - SLCs 7.16 and 7.17 for failure to submit the annual audited financial statements and related documents within the required timeframes; - SLCs 1.04 and 1.22(b) of the Rules in relation to the appointment of company officials; - SLCs 1.02 and 1.09 of the Rules as well as Article 13 of the ISA for failure to cooperate in an open and honest manner with the MFSA and for providing inconsistent information to the MFSA; - SLC 1.20 of the Rules for providing the Company’s Compliance Officer with incomplete and /or misleading information; - SLC 1.06(b) of the Rules for failing to formally notify the MFSA about its change in registered address. The seriousness of Sensus’ above breaches is aggravated by a number of factors including the following: - The Company does not appear to have acted in good faith and has not shown any degree of openness or co-operation; rather, it has, on numerous occasions, attempted to conceal information and mislead the MFSA whilst undertaking activities that went beyond its licence; - There are circumstances suggesting that, Sensus consciously concealed information and/or attempted to mislead the MFSA; - The seriousness of the Company’s infringements may have potentially caused losses to its clients as well as impacting its financial soundness, particularly since it failed to obtain a licence to operate as a Category 3 licence holder, and hence was not subject to more onerous licence conditions, including those related to capital requirements and reporting obligations; and - Sensus engaged in these actions in a repeated and systematic manner and hence its infringements cannot be described as being isolated incidents. Sensus has therefore been found in breach of a number of requirements which are inter alia intended both to protect investors and to ensure the financial soundness of the Company. It should be noted that the MFSA decision to cancel Sensus’ licence shall not become operative until the expiration of the period within which an appeal lies, and if an appeal is made within such period, the decision shall become operative on the date of the decision of the Tribunal dismissing the appeal or the date on which the appeal is abandoned.","sanctionType":null,"documentUrl":"https://registers.esma.europa.eu/publication/details?core=esma_registers_sanctions&docId=sn4303","assertedBy":["ESMA Sanctions Register"],"sourceNow":"ESMA Sanctions Register"}],"ownership":[],"lists":[{"source":"ESMA Sanctions Register","readAt":"2026-10-23T12:00:38.517Z","recordsRead":845,"publishedAt":null,"publishedAtBasis":null,"publisherVersion":null,"publisherRecordCount":null,"daysOldWhenRead":null,"detail":null,"statement":"Read on 23 October 2026. No date from the publisher is read for this file, so its age is not known here."}],"reading":{"assessmentId":"a3fe3d8c-29db-4827-9c01-131576d5a4ba","takenAt":"2026-09-12T19:15:01.228Z","methodology":"v4","level":"medium","overall":65,"digest":"3c07b3af479612211e447adb2c75fa5ae12db205","coverage":{"dimensions":[{"counts":{"found":1},"sources":[{"name":"ESMA Sanctions Register","status":"found","attemptedAt":"2026-09-12T19:14:40.601Z"}],"dimension":"sanctions"}],"jurisdictions":[{"gap":"No company register for this jurisdiction has been connected to this system, and none has been examined.","reasons":["registered here"],"countryId":"MT","registers":[]}]},"ownership":null},"limits":["Whether each listing was in force is rebuilt from what was recorded here: when it was first read, when a source stopped or resumed carrying it, and when its published term ended. A listing in force at an authority before this system first read it is shown from that first read.","No ownership verdict is kept for this company. Verdicts are kept for companies registered where shareholders are read here: Estonia, Latvia and Poland."]}