AL-HARAMAIN: AFGHANISTAN BRANCH

• SanctionsRecords foundSanctioned by 4 authorities: Japan MOF, UN Security Council, Switzerland SECO, Australia DFAT. Includes a UN Security Council listing, which binds every member state. Confirmed present in a source snapshot within the last 90 days.
• Debarment & exclusion— Checked, nothing found16 sources read, none holding a record for this company.
• Ownership & control— Not scoredNot scored. No ownership, control or officer records are on file for this company, which is an absence of evidence rather than an absence of risk.
• People— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.
• Identity & registration— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.
• JurisdictionRecords foundAfghanistan is named on a jurisdiction designation list — European Commission, EU list of high-risk third countries (AMLD Art. 9), section I: “High-risk third countries which have provided a written high-level political commitment to address the identified deficiencies and have developed an action plan with FATF.” The designation is of the jurisdiction, not of this record.
• Court records— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.

• Switzerland SECOActive

  ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida

  Designated 15 May 2025 · Switzerland SECO Sanctions List

• Japan MOFActive

  asset-freeze

  Designation date not published by this authority · Japan MOF Sanctions List

• Australia DFATActive

  1267 (ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida)

  Designated 20 Feb 2026 · Australia DFAT Consolidated List

• UN Security CouncilActive

  Al-Qaida

  Designated 6 Jul 2004 · UN Security Council Consolidated List

No corporate ownership records on file for this company. Ownership is recorded only where a register or a designating authority publishes it, and coverage is thin for companies outside the jurisdictions with open beneficial-ownership registers.

No people recorded against this company. Officer and ownership data comes from national business registers, and the registers this system reads cover a different set of countries from the sanctions lists — so a sanctioned company frequently has none.

Legal name

AL-HARAMAIN: AFGHANISTAN BRANCH

Also known as

AL-HARAMAIN: AFGHANISTAN BRANCH · Al-Haramain: Afghanistan Branch

Jurisdiction

AF

First recorded here

21 Jul 2026

1. Sanction listed: Australia DFAT — 1267 (ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida)

   10 Sept 2026 · Australia DFAT Consolidated List

2. Sanction listed: UN Security Council — Al-Qaida

   22 Jul 2026 · UN Security Council Consolidated List

3. Sanction listed: Switzerland SECO — ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida

   22 Jul 2026 · Switzerland SECO Sanctions List

4. Alias recorded: Al-Haramain: Afghanistan Branch

   22 Jul 2026 · Switzerland SECO Sanctions List

5. Sanction listed: Japan MOF — asset-freeze

   21 Jul 2026 · Japan MOF Sanctions List

6. Alias recorded: AL-HARAMAIN: AFGHANISTAN BRANCH

   21 Jul 2026 · Japan MOF Sanctions List

No ownership test is on file for this company. The test reads who holds a company's shares from its shareholder register, and it is run each day for companies with a number in Estonia's, Latvia's or Poland's register. For a company anywhere else, no register read here states its shareholders, so the test cannot be run.

No corporate ownership records on file. This is an absence of evidence, not evidence of a simple structure — see the risk breakdown, where the ownership component is left unscored for exactly this reason.

No people recorded against this company. Officer data comes from national business registers, and a company outside those jurisdictions will have none here even when its officers are publicly known elsewhere.

Nothing to draw: this company has no recorded links to another company on file.

No address has been read for this company, so this was never checked — which is not the same as finding nothing.

Each reading is kept with the methodology version that produced it. A later reading is not a correction of an earlier one — it is a different question asked of more sources.

• Fact

  al-haramain: afghanistan branch

  Legal name

  Evidence

  516

  Read 10 Sept 2026 · asserted by 4 records

  Source

  Australia DFAT Consolidated List and 3 other sources

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  AF

  Jurisdiction

  Evidence

  113453

  Read 10 Sept 2026 · asserted by 2 records

  Source

  UN Security Council Consolidated List and 1 other source

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  Australia DFAT — 1267 (ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida)

  Designation

  Evidence

  516

  Read 10 Sept 2026

  Source

  Australia DFAT Consolidated List

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  UN Security Council — Al-Qaida

  Designation

  Evidence

  113453

  Read 10 Sept 2026 · asserted by 2 records

  Source

  UN Security Council Consolidated List

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  Switzerland SECO — ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida

  Designation

  Evidence

  87702

  Read 17 Aug 2026 · asserted by 2 records

  Source

  Switzerland SECO Sanctions List

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  Japan MOF — asset-freeze

  Designation

  Evidence

  002-000445

  Read 17 Aug 2026 · asserted by 2 records

  Source

  Japan MOF Sanctions List

  Primary source ↗

Records from these sources are matched into one company only on a shared identifier, or by a human reviewer — never on name similarity alone. How this works. Not legal or compliance advice: check the originals before acting on anything here.

TRUE

A source states it. Rendered as a fact, with the source attached.

FALSE

A source explicitly denies it. Rare, and never inferred from silence.

UNKNOWN

Checked, nothing found. Rendered as an em dash, never as 0 or "no".

NOT_ASSESSED

Never checked — nothing was read here. Excluded from coverage, and not counted as clean.

6 records on this company — identifiers, aliases, officers, listings, figures — each carry the source that wrote them and are shown beside their own entries. The fields above are different: the entities table has no source column, so what is shown is every source whose stored payload contains the value verbatim. That is strong evidence, not proof of which write landed it, and where nothing contains the value the row says so instead of naming a plausible source.