FORCES DEMOCRATIQUES DE LIBERATION DU RWANDA (FDLR)

• SanctionsRecords foundSanctioned by 3 authorities: Taiwan International Trade Administration, UK OFSI, Australia DFAT. Confirmed present in a source snapshot within the last 90 days.
• Debarment & exclusion— Checked, nothing found16 sources read, none holding a record for this company.
• Ownership & control— Not scoredNot scored. No ownership, control or officer records are on file for this company, which is an absence of evidence rather than an absence of risk.
• People— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.
• Identity & registration— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.
• JurisdictionRecords foundDR Congo is named on a jurisdiction designation list — European Commission, EU list of high-risk third countries (AMLD Art. 9), section I: “High-risk third countries which have provided a written high-level political commitment to address the identified deficiencies and have developed an action plan with FATF.” The designation is of the jurisdiction, not of this record.
• Court records— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.

• Taiwan International Trade AdministrationActive

  Strategic high-tech commodities entity list

  Designation date not published by this authority · Taiwan SHTC export entity list

• Australia DFATActive

  1533 (Democratic People’s Republic of the Congo)

  Designated 11 Dec 2025 · Australia DFAT Consolidated List

• UK OFSIActive

  Democratic Republic of the Congo

  Designated 31 Dec 2012 · UK Sanctions List (FCDO)

No corporate ownership records on file for this company. Ownership is recorded only where a register or a designating authority publishes it, and coverage is thin for companies outside the jurisdictions with open beneficial-ownership registers.

No people recorded against this company. Officer and ownership data comes from national business registers, and the registers this system reads cover a different set of countries from the sanctions lists — so a sanctioned company frequently has none.

Legal name

FORCES DEMOCRATIQUES DE LIBERATION DU RWANDA (FDLR)

Also known as

FORCES DEMOCRATIQUES DE LIBERATION DU RWANDA (FDLR) · FDLR · Force Combattante Abacunguzi · Combatant Force for the Liberation of Rwanda +3

Jurisdiction

CD

First recorded here

17 Aug 2026

1. Sanction listed: UK OFSI — Democratic Republic of the Congo

   10 Sept 2026 · UK OFSI Consolidated List

2. Sanction listed: Australia DFAT — 1533 (Democratic People’s Republic of the Congo)

   10 Sept 2026 · Australia DFAT Consolidated List

3. Alias recorded: Forces Democratiques De Liberation Du Rwanda

   10 Sept 2026 · Australia DFAT Consolidated List

4. Alias recorded: Forces Democratiques De Liberation Du Rwanda (FDLR)

   10 Sept 2026 · Australia DFAT Consolidated List

5. Sanction listed: Taiwan International Trade Administration — Strategic high-tech commodities entity list

   17 Aug 2026 · Taiwan SHTC export entity list

6. Alias recorded: FOCA

   17 Aug 2026 · Taiwan SHTC export entity list

No ownership test is on file for this company. The test reads who holds a company's shares from its shareholder register, and it is run each day for companies with a number in Estonia's, Latvia's or Poland's register. For a company anywhere else, no register read here states its shareholders, so the test cannot be run.

No corporate ownership records on file. This is an absence of evidence, not evidence of a simple structure — see the risk breakdown, where the ownership component is left unscored for exactly this reason.

No people recorded against this company. Officer data comes from national business registers, and a company outside those jurisdictions will have none here even when its officers are publicly known elsewhere.

Nothing to draw: this company has no recorded links to another company on file.

No address has been read for this company, so this was never checked — which is not the same as finding nothing.

Each reading is kept with the methodology version that produced it. A later reading is not a correction of an earlier one — it is a different question asked of more sources.

• Fact

  forces democratiques de liberation du rwanda (fdlr)

  Legal name

  Evidence

  12840

  Read 13 Sept 2026 · asserted by 4 records

  Source

  UK Sanctions List (FCDO) and 3 other sources

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  CD

  Jurisdiction

  Evidence

  6372f0b58b60b4efff0a095b

  Read 17 Aug 2026

  Source

  Taiwan SHTC export entity list

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  UK OFSI — Democratic Republic of the Congo

  Designation

  Evidence

  12840

  Read 13 Sept 2026 · asserted by 2 records

  Source

  UK Sanctions List (FCDO) and 1 other source

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  Australia DFAT — 1533 (Democratic People’s Republic of the Congo)

  Designation

  Evidence

  2573

  Read 10 Sept 2026

  Source

  Australia DFAT Consolidated List

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  Taiwan International Trade Administration — Strategic high-tech commodities entity list

  Designation

  Evidence

  6372f0b58b60b4efff0a095b

  Read 17 Aug 2026

  Source

  Taiwan SHTC export entity list

  Primary source ↗

Records from these sources are matched into one company only on a shared identifier, or by a human reviewer — never on name similarity alone. How this works. Not legal or compliance advice: check the originals before acting on anything here.

TRUE

A source states it. Rendered as a fact, with the source attached.

FALSE

A source explicitly denies it. Rare, and never inferred from silence.

UNKNOWN

Checked, nothing found. Rendered as an em dash, never as 0 or "no".

NOT_ASSESSED

Never checked — nothing was read here. Excluded from coverage, and not counted as clean.

10 records on this company — identifiers, aliases, officers, listings, figures — each carry the source that wrote them and are shown beside their own entries. The fields above are different: the entities table has no source column, so what is shown is every source whose stored payload contains the value verbatim. That is strong evidence, not proof of which write landed it, and where nothing contains the value the row says so instead of naming a plausible source.