CompanyLast read from source 20 Oct 2026
No active sanctions listing from any of the authorities this system reads.
Debarments · not sanctions
Start date not published · US CBP forced-labour orders (WRO & Findings)
Since 21 Jun 2022 · US UFLPA Entity List
No corporate ownership records on file for this company. Ownership is recorded only where a register or a designating authority publishes it, and coverage is thin for companies outside the jurisdictions with open beneficial-ownership registers.
No people recorded against this company. Officer and ownership data comes from national business registers, and the registers this system reads cover a different set of countries from the sanctions lists — so a sanctioned company frequently has none.
Debarment listed: US Customs and Border Protection — Withhold Release Order — forced labour (19 U.S.C. 1307): Computer Parts
13 Oct 2026 · US CBP forced-labour orders (WRO & Findings)
Debarment lifted: US Customs and Border Protection — Withhold Release Order — forced labour (19 U.S.C. 1307): Computer Parts
6 Oct 2026 · US CBP forced-labour orders (WRO & Findings)
Debarment listed: US Customs and Border Protection — Withhold Release Order — forced labour (19 U.S.C. 1307): Computer Parts
8 Sept 2026 · US CBP forced-labour orders (WRO & Findings)
Alias recorded: Hefei Bitland Information Technology Co., Ltd.
8 Sept 2026 · US CBP forced-labour orders (WRO & Findings)
Debarment lifted: US Customs and Border Protection — Withhold Release Order — forced labour (19 U.S.C. 1307): Computer Parts
1 Sept 2026 · US CBP forced-labour orders (WRO & Findings)
Debarment listed: US DHS (UFLPA) — Section 2(d)(2)(B)(v) — entities that exported products described in clause (iii) from the PRC into the United States Section 2(d)(2)(B)(iv) Entities identified in sections (i) and (ii) above may serve as both manufactures and exporters. We have not identified additional exporters at this time but will continue to investigate and gather information about additional relevant entities. A list of facilities and entities, including the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, that source material from Xinjiang or from persons working with the government of Xinjiang or the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps for purposes of the ‘‘poverty alleviation’’ program or the ‘‘pairing-assistance’’ program or any other government-labor scheme that uses forced labor
15 Aug 2026 · US UFLPA Entity List
No ownership test is on file for this company. The test reads who holds a company's shares from its shareholder register, and it is run each day for companies with a number in Estonia's, Latvia's or Poland's register. For a company anywhere else, no register read here states its shareholders, so the test cannot be run.
No corporate ownership records on file. This is an absence of evidence, not evidence of a simple structure — see the risk breakdown, where the ownership component is left unscored for exactly this reason.
No people recorded against this company. Officer data comes from national business registers, and a company outside those jurisdictions will have none here even when its officers are publicly known elsewhere.
No sanctions listing in force on file.
A debarment excludes the company from public contracts or from a development bank's financing, or warns that it is not authorised. It freezes nothing and is not a sanction, so none is counted above.
2 earlier debarments on file, since ended or lifted: US Customs and Border Protection.
Nothing to draw: this company has no recorded links to another company on file.
No address has been read for this company, so this was never checked — which is not the same as finding nothing.
Debarment listed: US Customs and Border Protection — Withhold Release Order — forced labour (19 U.S.C. 1307): Computer Parts
13 Oct 2026 · US CBP forced-labour orders (WRO & Findings)
Debarment lifted: US Customs and Border Protection — Withhold Release Order — forced labour (19 U.S.C. 1307): Computer Parts
6 Oct 2026 · US CBP forced-labour orders (WRO & Findings)
Debarment listed: US Customs and Border Protection — Withhold Release Order — forced labour (19 U.S.C. 1307): Computer Parts
8 Sept 2026 · US CBP forced-labour orders (WRO & Findings)
Alias recorded: Hefei Bitland Information Technology Co., Ltd.
8 Sept 2026 · US CBP forced-labour orders (WRO & Findings)
Debarment lifted: US Customs and Border Protection — Withhold Release Order — forced labour (19 U.S.C. 1307): Computer Parts
1 Sept 2026 · US CBP forced-labour orders (WRO & Findings)
Debarment listed: US DHS (UFLPA) — Section 2(d)(2)(B)(v) — entities that exported products described in clause (iii) from the PRC into the United States Section 2(d)(2)(B)(iv) Entities identified in sections (i) and (ii) above may serve as both manufactures and exporters. We have not identified additional exporters at this time but will continue to investigate and gather information about additional relevant entities. A list of facilities and entities, including the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, that source material from Xinjiang or from persons working with the government of Xinjiang or the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps for purposes of the ‘‘poverty alleviation’’ program or the ‘‘pairing-assistance’’ program or any other government-labor scheme that uses forced labor
15 Aug 2026 · US UFLPA Entity List
Alias recorded: Hefei Bitland Information Technology Co. Ltd.
15 Aug 2026 · US UFLPA Entity List
First recorded: Hefei Bitland Information Technology Co. Ltd.
15 Aug 2026 · US UFLPA Entity List
Dates are when each fact was first recorded here, which for older entries is when the source was first read rather than when the authority acted. Changes across all companies ›
No published story on this site mentions this company. Mentions are linked only where a published article names a company already resolved here, and the published set is small — so an empty section says nothing about how much has been written elsewhere.
Sanctions and debarments: 48 · Ownership risk: not scored · Jurisdiction: not scored · Evidence coverage: 60 · Adverse media: not scored
Sanctions and debarments: 48 · Ownership risk: not scored · Jurisdiction: not scored · Evidence coverage: 60 · Adverse media: not scored
Sanctions exposure: 68 · Ownership risk: not scored · Jurisdiction: not scored · Evidence coverage: 60 · Adverse media: not scored
Sanctions exposure: 60 · Ownership risk: not scored · Jurisdiction: not scored · Evidence coverage: 60 · Adverse media: not scored
Each reading is kept with the methodology version that produced it. A later reading is not a correction of an earlier one — it is a different question asked of more sources.
Fact
hefei bitland information technology co
Legal name
Evidence
cbp-9/8/2020-w-hefei-bitland-information-technology-co-ltd-
Read 13 Oct 2026 · asserted by 3 records
Fact
CN
Jurisdiction
Evidence
cbp-9/8/2020-w-hefei-bitland-information-technology-co-ltd-
Read 13 Oct 2026 · asserted by 3 records
Fact
US Customs and Border Protection — Withhold Release Order — forced labour (19 U.S.C. 1307): Computer Parts
Designation
Evidence
cbp-9/8/2020-w-hefei-bitland-information-technology-co-ltd-
Read 13 Oct 2026 · asserted by 2 records
Fact
US DHS (UFLPA) — Section 2(d)(2)(B)(v) — entities that exported products described in clause (iii) from the PRC into the United States Section 2(d)(2)(B)(iv) Entities identified in sections (i) and (ii) above may serve as both manufactures and exporters. We have not identified additional exporters at this time but will continue to investigate and gather information about additional relevant entities. A list of facilities and entities, including the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, that source material from Xinjiang or from persons working with the government of Xinjiang or the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps for purposes of the ‘‘poverty alleviation’’ program or the ‘‘pairing-assistance’’ program or any other government-labor scheme that uses forced labor
Designation
Evidence
uflpa-hefei-bitland-information-technology-co-ltd-
Read 15 Aug 2026 · in force from 21 Jun 2022
No company register for this jurisdiction has been connected to this system, and none has been examined.
Records from these sources are matched into one company only on a shared identifier, or by a human reviewer — never on name similarity alone. How this works. Not legal or compliance advice: check the originals before acting on anything here.
7 records on this company — identifiers, aliases, officers, listings, figures — each carry the source that wrote them and are shown beside their own entries. The fields above are different: the entities table has no source column, so what is shown is every source whose stored payload contains the value verbatim. That is strong evidence, not proof of which write landed it, and where nothing contains the value the row says so instead of naming a plausible source.