FUCHS & ASSOCIES FINANCE S.A.

• Sanctions— Checked, nothing foundNo sanctions listing in force.
• Debarment & exclusionRecords foundNo sanctions listing. Debarred by 1 authority: Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF). A debarment excludes a company from public contracts or financing and freezes nothing, so it is scored from a lower base than a sanction (35 against 55). Confirmed present in a source snapshot within the last 90 days.
• Ownership & control— Not scoredNot scored. No ownership, control or officer records are on file for this company, which is an absence of evidence rather than an absence of risk.
• People— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.
• Identity & registration— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.
• Jurisdiction— Not scoredNot scored. The jurisdiction lists this system reads are: EU list of high-risk third countries (AMLD Art. 9). Each names specific countries, so absence from them is not a clearance of Luxembourg. Separately, 8 of the sanctions authorities this system reads have designated companies registered in Luxembourg — a count of this corpus, not a rating of the jurisdiction.
• Court records— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.

No active sanctions listing from any of the authorities this system reads.

No corporate ownership records on file for this company. Ownership is recorded only where a register or a designating authority publishes it, and coverage is thin for companies outside the jurisdictions with open beneficial-ownership registers.

No people recorded against this company. Officer and ownership data comes from national business registers, and the registers this system reads cover a different set of countries from the sanctions lists — so a sanctioned company frequently has none.

Legal name

FUCHS & ASSOCIES FINANCE S.A.

Also known as

FUCHS & ASSOCIES FINANCE S.A.

Jurisdiction

LU

First recorded here

12 Sept 2026

1. Debarment lifted: Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) — Debarment

   12 Sept 2026 · ESMA Sanctions Register

2. Debarment lifted: Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) — Debarment

   12 Sept 2026 · ESMA Sanctions Register

3. Debarment listed: Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) — MAR

   12 Sept 2026 · ESMA Sanctions Register

4. Debarment listed: Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) — MiFID

   12 Sept 2026 · ESMA Sanctions Register

5. Debarment listed: Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) — Debarment

   12 Sept 2026 · ESMA Sanctions Register

6. Debarment listed: Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) — Debarment

   12 Sept 2026 · ESMA Sanctions Register

No ownership test is on file for this company. The test reads who holds a company's shares from its shareholder register, and it is run each day for companies with a number in Estonia's, Latvia's or Poland's register. For a company anywhere else, no register read here states its shareholders, so the test cannot be run.

No corporate ownership records on file. This is an absence of evidence, not evidence of a simple structure — see the risk breakdown, where the ownership component is left unscored for exactly this reason.

No people recorded against this company. Officer data comes from national business registers, and a company outside those jurisdictions will have none here even when its officers are publicly known elsewhere.

No sanctions listing in force on file.

A debarment excludes the company from public contracts or from a development bank's financing, or warns that it is not authorised. It freezes nothing and is not a sanction, so none is counted above.

2 earlier debarments on file, since ended or lifted: Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF).

Nothing to draw: this company has no recorded links to another company on file.

No address has been read for this company, so this was never checked — which is not the same as finding nothing.

Each reading is kept with the methodology version that produced it. A later reading is not a correction of an earlier one — it is a different question asked of more sources.

• Fact

  lei:549300NIP1LPQMK6PE93

  Registered identifier

  Evidence

  sn11507

  Read 12 Sept 2026 · asserted by 2 records

  Source

  ESMA Sanctions Register

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  fuchs & associes finance

  Legal name

  Evidence

  sn11507

  Read 12 Sept 2026 · asserted by 2 records

  Source

  ESMA Sanctions Register

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  LU

  Jurisdiction

  Evidence

  sn11507

  Read 12 Sept 2026 · asserted by 2 records

  Source

  ESMA Sanctions Register

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) — MAR

  Designation

  Evidence

  sn11507

  Read 12 Sept 2026 · in force from 4 May 2022

  Source

  ESMA Sanctions Register

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) — MiFID

  Designation

  Evidence

  sn11508

  Read 12 Sept 2026 · in force from 4 May 2022

  Source

  ESMA Sanctions Register

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) — Debarment

  Designation

  Evidence

  sn11507

  Read 12 Sept 2026 · in force from 4 May 2022 · asserted by 2 records

  Source

  ESMA Sanctions Register

  Primary source ↗

Records from these sources are matched into one company only on a shared identifier, or by a human reviewer — never on name similarity alone. How this works. Not legal or compliance advice: check the originals before acting on anything here.

TRUE

A source states it. Rendered as a fact, with the source attached.

FALSE

A source explicitly denies it. Rare, and never inferred from silence.

UNKNOWN

Checked, nothing found. Rendered as an em dash, never as 0 or "no".

NOT_ASSESSED

Never checked — nothing was read here. Excluded from coverage, and not counted as clean.

6 records on this company — identifiers, aliases, officers, listings, figures — each carry the source that wrote them and are shown beside their own entries. The fields above are different: the entities table has no source column, so what is shown is every source whose stored payload contains the value verbatim. That is strong evidence, not proof of which write landed it, and where nothing contains the value the row says so instead of naming a plausible source.

LEI

549300NIP1LPQMK6PE93via ESMA Sanctions Register