Construtora Coesa S.A. - Sucursal Uruguay

• Sanctions— Checked, nothing foundNo sanctions listing in force.
• Debarment & exclusionRecords foundNo sanctions listing. Debarred by 2 authorities: IDB, World Bank. A debarment excludes a company from public contracts or financing and freezes nothing, so it is scored from a lower base than a sanction (35 against 55). Confirmed present in a source snapshot within the last 90 days.
• Ownership & control— Not scoredNot scored. No ownership, control or officer records are on file for this company, which is an absence of evidence rather than an absence of risk.
• People— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.
• Identity & registration— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.
• Jurisdiction— Not scoredNot scored. The jurisdiction lists this system reads are: EU list of high-risk third countries (AMLD Art. 9). Each names specific countries, so absence from them is not a clearance of Uruguay. Separately, 2 of the sanctions authorities this system reads have designated companies registered in Uruguay — a count of this corpus, not a rating of the jurisdiction.
• Court records— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.

No active sanctions listing from any of the authorities this system reads.

No corporate ownership records on file for this company. Ownership is recorded only where a register or a designating authority publishes it, and coverage is thin for companies outside the jurisdictions with open beneficial-ownership registers.

No people recorded against this company. Officer and ownership data comes from national business registers, and the registers this system reads cover a different set of countries from the sanctions lists — so a sanctioned company frequently has none.

Legal name

Construtora Coesa S.A. - Sucursal Uruguay

Also known as

Construtora Coesa S.A. - Sucursal Uruguay · CONSTRUTORA COESA S.A. - SUCURSAL URUGUAY

Jurisdiction

UY

Address

Avenida Luis Alberto de Herrera, n. 1248, Torre Avenidas, Oficina 321, Montevideo, Uruguay

First recorded here

9 Aug 2026

1. Debarment listed: IDB — Cross-debarment (published by EBRD)

   8 Oct 2026 · EBRD Ineligible Entities

2. Debarment listed: IDB — Cross-debarment (published by AIIB)

   18 Sept 2026 · AIIB Debarment List

3. Alias recorded: CONSTRUTORA COESA S.A. - SUCURSAL URUGUAY

   18 Sept 2026 · AIIB Debarment List

4. Debarment listed: IDB — Cross-debarment (published by EBRD)

   9 Aug 2026 · EBRD Ineligible Entities

5. Alias recorded: Construtora Coesa S.A. - Sucursal Uruguay

   9 Aug 2026 · EBRD Ineligible Entities

6. First recorded: Construtora Coesa S.A. - Sucursal Uruguay

   9 Aug 2026 · EBRD Ineligible Entities

No ownership test is on file for this company. The test reads who holds a company's shares from its shareholder register, and it is run each day for companies with a number in Estonia's, Latvia's or Poland's register. For a company anywhere else, no register read here states its shareholders, so the test cannot be run.

No corporate ownership records on file. This is an absence of evidence, not evidence of a simple structure — see the risk breakdown, where the ownership component is left unscored for exactly this reason.

No people recorded against this company. Officer data comes from national business registers, and a company outside those jurisdictions will have none here even when its officers are publicly known elsewhere.

No sanctions listing in force on file.

A debarment excludes the company from public contracts or from a development bank's financing, or warns that it is not authorised. It freezes nothing and is not a sanction, so none is counted above.

1 earlier debarment on file, since ended or lifted: IDB.

Nothing to draw: this company has no recorded links to another company on file.

No other company on file shares Avenida Luis Alberto de Herrera, n. 1248, Torre Avenidas, Oficina 321, Montevideo, Uruguay.

Each reading is kept with the methodology version that produced it. A later reading is not a correction of an earlier one — it is a different question asked of more sources.

• Fact

  construtora coesa - sucursal uruguay

  Legal name

  Evidence

  ebrd-266283ff940c2d09

  Read 8 Oct 2026 · asserted by 3 records

  Source

  EBRD Ineligible Entities and 1 other source

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  construtora coesa s a - sucursal uruguay

  Legal name

  Evidence

  ebrd-165fbcfc403b2aa2

  Read 11 Aug 2026

  Source

  EBRD Ineligible Entities

  Primary source ↗

  Superseded 10 Sept 2026 — the source has since published a different value. Kept rather than overwritten, so the change itself stays readable.

• Fact

  UY

  Jurisdiction

  Evidence

  ebrd-266283ff940c2d09

  Read 8 Oct 2026 · asserted by 3 records

  Source

  EBRD Ineligible Entities and 1 other source

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  IDB — Cross-debarment (published by EBRD)

  Designation

  Evidence

  ebrd-266283ff940c2d09

  Read 8 Oct 2026 · in force from 18 Mar 2022 · until 15 Dec 2026 · asserted by 3 records

  Source

  EBRD Ineligible Entities

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  IDB — Cross-debarment (published by AIIB)

  Designation

  Evidence

  aiib-8d084416f154863d

  Read 18 Sept 2026 · in force from 18 Mar 2022 · until 15 Dec 2026

  Source

  AIIB Debarment List

  Primary source ↗

Records from these sources are matched into one company only on a shared identifier, or by a human reviewer — never on name similarity alone. How this works. Not legal or compliance advice: check the originals before acting on anything here.

TRUE

A source states it. Rendered as a fact, with the source attached.

FALSE

A source explicitly denies it. Rare, and never inferred from silence.

UNKNOWN

Checked, nothing found. Rendered as an em dash, never as 0 or "no".

NOT_ASSESSED

Never checked — nothing was read here. Excluded from coverage, and not counted as clean.

6 records on this company — identifiers, aliases, officers, listings, figures — each carry the source that wrote them and are shown beside their own entries. The fields above are different: the entities table has no source column, so what is shown is every source whose stored payload contains the value verbatim. That is strong evidence, not proof of which write landed it, and where nothing contains the value the row says so instead of naming a plausible source.