Al-Inma Holding Co. for Services Investments

• SanctionsRecords foundSanctioned by 4 authorities: France gels des avoirs, EU, UK OFSI, Switzerland SECO. Confirmed present in a source snapshot within the last 90 days.
• Debarment & exclusion— Checked, nothing found16 sources read, none holding a record for this company.
• Ownership & controlRecords foundControlled by a designated company: LIBYAN INVESTMENT AUTHORITY.
• People— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.
• Identity & registration— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.
• Jurisdiction— Not scoredNot scored. No country is recorded for this record.
• Court records— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.

• France gels des avoirsActive

  (UE) 360/2011 du 12/04/2011 - (UE Libye - R (UE) 2016/44)

  Designation date not published by this authority · France Registre national des gels

• Switzerland SECOActive

  Libya

  Designated 28 Aug 2015 · Switzerland SECO Sanctions List

• UK OFSIActive

  Libya

  Designated 31 Dec 2020 · UK Sanctions List (FCDO)

• EUActive

  LBY

  Designated 12 Apr 2011 · EU Consolidated Sanctions List

No people recorded against this company. Officer and ownership data comes from national business registers, and the registers this system reads cover a different set of countries from the sanctions lists — so a sanctioned company frequently has none.

Legal name

Al-Inma Holding Co. for Services Investments

Also known as

Al-Inma Holding Co. for Services Investments

First recorded here

21 Jul 2026

1. Sanction listed: France gels des avoirs — (UE) 360/2011 du 12/04/2011 - (UE Libye - R (UE) 2016/44)

   28 Sept 2026 · France Registre national des gels

2. Parent company recorded: LIBYAN INVESTMENT AUTHORITY

   11 Sept 2026 · UK OFSI Consolidated List

3. Sanction listed: EU — LBY

   10 Sept 2026 · EU Consolidated Sanctions List

4. Sanction listed: UK OFSI — Libya

   10 Sept 2026 · UK OFSI Consolidated List

5. Sanction listed: Switzerland SECO — Libya

   21 Jul 2026 · Switzerland SECO Sanctions List

6. Alias recorded: Al-Inma Holding Co. for Services Investments

   21 Jul 2026 · Switzerland SECO Sanctions List

No ownership test is on file for this company. The test reads who holds a company's shares from its shareholder register, and it is run each day for companies with a number in Estonia's, Latvia's or Poland's register. For a company anywhere else, no register read here states its shareholders, so the test cannot be run.

No people recorded against this company. Officer data comes from national business registers, and a company outside those jurisdictions will have none here even when its officers are publicly known elsewhere.

3 companies, 2 recorded links, up to two steps from this record. Open the full graph ›

No address has been read for this company, so this was never checked — which is not the same as finding nothing.

Each reading is kept with the methodology version that produced it. A later reading is not a correction of an earlier one — it is a different question asked of more sources.

• Fact

  al-inma holding co for services investments

  Legal name

  Evidence

  1954

  Read 28 Sept 2026 · asserted by 5 records

  Source

  France Registre national des gels and 4 other sources

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  France gels des avoirs — (UE) 360/2011 du 12/04/2011 - (UE Libye - R (UE) 2016/44)

  Designation

  Evidence

  1954

  Read 28 Sept 2026

  Source

  France Registre national des gels

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  UK OFSI — Libya

  Designation

  Evidence

  11747

  Read 13 Sept 2026 · asserted by 2 records

  Source

  UK Sanctions List (FCDO) and 1 other source

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  EU — LBY

  Designation

  Evidence

  6243

  Read 10 Sept 2026

  Source

  EU Consolidated Sanctions List

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  Switzerland SECO — Libya

  Designation

  Evidence

  20804

  Read 17 Aug 2026 · asserted by 2 records

  Source

  Switzerland SECO Sanctions List

  Primary source ↗

Records from these sources are matched into one company only on a shared identifier, or by a human reviewer — never on name similarity alone. How this works. Not legal or compliance advice: check the originals before acting on anything here.

TRUE

A source states it. Rendered as a fact, with the source attached.

FALSE

A source explicitly denies it. Rare, and never inferred from silence.

UNKNOWN

Checked, nothing found. Rendered as an em dash, never as 0 or "no".

NOT_ASSESSED

Never checked — nothing was read here. Excluded from coverage, and not counted as clean.

5 records on this company — identifiers, aliases, officers, listings, figures — each carry the source that wrote them and are shown beside their own entries. The fields above are different: the entities table has no source column, so what is shown is every source whose stored payload contains the value verbatim. That is strong evidence, not proof of which write landed it, and where nothing contains the value the row says so instead of naming a plausible source.