Cham Holdings

• SanctionsRecords foundSanctioned by 1 authority: Canada. Confirmed present in a source snapshot within the last 90 days.
• Debarment & exclusion— Checked, nothing found16 sources read, none holding a record for this company.
• Ownership & controlRecords foundControlled by a designated company: Bena Properties.
• People— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.
• Identity & registration— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.
• Jurisdiction— Not scoredNot scored. No country is recorded for this record.
• Court records— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.

• CanadaActive

  Syria

  Designated 3 Oct 2011 · Canada Consolidated Autonomous Sanctions List

No people recorded against this company. Officer and ownership data comes from national business registers, and the registers this system reads cover a different set of countries from the sanctions lists — so a sanctioned company frequently has none.

Legal name

Cham Holdings

Also known as

Cham Holdings

First recorded here

28 Aug 2026

1. Parent company recorded: Bena Properties

   11 Sept 2026 · UK OFSI Consolidated List

2. Subsidiary recorded: Bena Properties

   11 Sept 2026 · UK OFSI Consolidated List

3. Sanction listed: Canada — Syria

   28 Aug 2026 · Canada Consolidated Autonomous Sanctions List

4. Alias recorded: Cham Holdings

   28 Aug 2026 · Canada Consolidated Autonomous Sanctions List

5. First recorded: Cham Holdings

   28 Aug 2026 · Canada Consolidated Autonomous Sanctions List

No ownership test is on file for this company. The test reads who holds a company's shares from its shareholder register, and it is run each day for companies with a number in Estonia's, Latvia's or Poland's register. For a company anywhere else, no register read here states its shareholders, so the test cannot be run.

No people recorded against this company. Officer data comes from national business registers, and a company outside those jurisdictions will have none here even when its officers are publicly known elsewhere.

4 companies, 4 recorded links, up to two steps from this record. Open the full graph ›

No address has been read for this company, so this was never checked — which is not the same as finding nothing.

Each reading is kept with the methodology version that produced it. A later reading is not a correction of an earlier one — it is a different question asked of more sources.

• Fact

  cham holdings

  Legal name

  Evidence

  syria-Part 1-17-cham-holdings

  Read 28 Aug 2026

  Source

  Canada Consolidated Autonomous Sanctions List

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  Canada — Syria

  Designation

  Evidence

  syria-Part 1-17-cham-holdings

  Read 28 Aug 2026 · in force from 3 Oct 2011

  Source

  Canada Consolidated Autonomous Sanctions List

  Primary source ↗

Records from these sources are matched into one company only on a shared identifier, or by a human reviewer — never on name similarity alone. How this works. Not legal or compliance advice: check the originals before acting on anything here.

TRUE

A source states it. Rendered as a fact, with the source attached.

FALSE

A source explicitly denies it. Rare, and never inferred from silence.

UNKNOWN

Checked, nothing found. Rendered as an em dash, never as 0 or "no".

NOT_ASSESSED

Never checked — nothing was read here. Excluded from coverage, and not counted as clean.

2 records on this company — identifiers, aliases, officers, listings, figures — each carry the source that wrote them and are shown beside their own entries. The fields above are different: the entities table has no source column, so what is shown is every source whose stored payload contains the value verbatim. That is strong evidence, not proof of which write landed it, and where nothing contains the value the row says so instead of naming a plausible source.