LAP Green Networks

• SanctionsRecords foundSanctioned by 4 authorities: Switzerland SECO, France gels des avoirs, UK OFSI, EU. Confirmed present in a source snapshot within the last 90 days.
• Debarment & exclusion— Checked, nothing found16 sources read, none holding a record for this company.
• Ownership & control— Not scoredNot scored. No ownership, control or officer records are on file for this company, which is an absence of evidence rather than an absence of risk.
• People— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.
• Identity & registration— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.
• Jurisdiction— Not scoredNot scored. The jurisdiction lists this system reads are: EU list of high-risk third countries (AMLD Art. 9). Each names specific countries, so absence from them is not a clearance of Mauritius. Separately, 6 of the sanctions authorities this system reads have designated companies registered in Mauritius — a count of this corpus, not a rating of the jurisdiction.
• Court records— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.

• France gels des avoirsActive

  (UE) 2015/1323 du 31/07/2015 (UE Libye - R (UE) 2016/44)

  Designation date not published by this authority · France Registre national des gels

• France gels des avoirsActive

  (UE) 360/2011 du 12/04/2011 - (UE Libye - R (UE) 2016/44)

  Designation date not published by this authority · France Registre national des gels

• Switzerland SECOActive

  Libya

  Designated 28 Aug 2015 · Switzerland SECO Sanctions List

• UK OFSIActive

  Libya

  Designated 31 Dec 2020 · UK Sanctions List (FCDO)

• EUActive

  LBY

  Designated 12 Apr 2011 · EU Consolidated Sanctions List

No corporate ownership records on file for this company. Ownership is recorded only where a register or a designating authority publishes it, and coverage is thin for companies outside the jurisdictions with open beneficial-ownership registers.

No people recorded against this company. Officer and ownership data comes from national business registers, and the registers this system reads cover a different set of countries from the sanctions lists — so a sanctioned company frequently has none.

Legal name

LAP Green Networks

Also known as

LAP Green Networks · LAP GreenN · LAP Green Holding Company · Lap Green +2

Jurisdiction

MU

First recorded here

21 Jul 2026

1. Alias recorded: Lap Greenn

   13 Sept 2026 · UK Sanctions List (FCDO)

2. Sanction listed: France gels des avoirs — (UE) 2015/1323 du 31/07/2015 (UE Libye - R (UE) 2016/44)

   12 Sept 2026 · France Registre national des gels

3. Sanction listed: France gels des avoirs — (UE) 360/2011 du 12/04/2011 - (UE Libye - R (UE) 2016/44)

   12 Sept 2026 · France Registre national des gels

4. Alias recorded: Lap Green

   12 Sept 2026 · France Registre national des gels

5. Sanction listed: EU — LBY

   10 Sept 2026 · EU Consolidated Sanctions List

6. Sanction listed: UK OFSI — Libya

   10 Sept 2026 · UK OFSI Consolidated List

No ownership test is on file for this company. The test reads who holds a company's shares from its shareholder register, and it is run each day for companies with a number in Estonia's, Latvia's or Poland's register. For a company anywhere else, no register read here states its shareholders, so the test cannot be run.

No corporate ownership records on file. This is an absence of evidence, not evidence of a simple structure — see the risk breakdown, where the ownership component is left unscored for exactly this reason.

No people recorded against this company. Officer data comes from national business registers, and a company outside those jurisdictions will have none here even when its officers are publicly known elsewhere.

Nothing to draw: this company has no recorded links to another company on file.

No address has been read for this company, so this was never checked — which is not the same as finding nothing.

Each reading is kept with the methodology version that produced it. A later reading is not a correction of an earlier one — it is a different question asked of more sources.

• Fact

  lap green holding

  Legal name

  Evidence

  6249

  Read 28 Sept 2026

  Source

  EU Consolidated Sanctions List

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  lap green networks

  Legal name

  Evidence

  11753

  Read 13 Sept 2026 · asserted by 5 records

  Source

  UK Sanctions List (FCDO) and 4 other sources

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  MU

  Jurisdiction

  Evidence

  11753

  Read 13 Sept 2026 · asserted by 3 records

  Source

  UK Sanctions List (FCDO) and 2 other sources

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  UK OFSI — Libya

  Designation

  Evidence

  11753

  Read 13 Sept 2026 · asserted by 2 records

  Source

  UK Sanctions List (FCDO) and 1 other source

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  France gels des avoirs — (UE) 2015/1323 du 31/07/2015 (UE Libye - R (UE) 2016/44)

  Designation

  Evidence

  1980

  Read 12 Sept 2026

  Source

  France Registre national des gels

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  France gels des avoirs — (UE) 360/2011 du 12/04/2011 - (UE Libye - R (UE) 2016/44)

  Designation

  Evidence

  1980

  Read 12 Sept 2026

  Source

  France Registre national des gels

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  EU — LBY

  Designation

  Evidence

  6249

  Read 10 Sept 2026

  Source

  EU Consolidated Sanctions List

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  Switzerland SECO — Libya

  Designation

  Evidence

  20824

  Read 17 Aug 2026 · asserted by 2 records

  Source

  Switzerland SECO Sanctions List

  Primary source ↗

Records from these sources are matched into one company only on a shared identifier, or by a human reviewer — never on name similarity alone. How this works. Not legal or compliance advice: check the originals before acting on anything here.

TRUE

A source states it. Rendered as a fact, with the source attached.

FALSE

A source explicitly denies it. Rare, and never inferred from silence.

UNKNOWN

Checked, nothing found. Rendered as an em dash, never as 0 or "no".

NOT_ASSESSED

Never checked — nothing was read here. Excluded from coverage, and not counted as clean.

11 records on this company — identifiers, aliases, officers, listings, figures — each carry the source that wrote them and are shown beside their own entries. The fields above are different: the entities table has no source column, so what is shown is every source whose stored payload contains the value verbatim. That is strong evidence, not proof of which write landed it, and where nothing contains the value the row says so instead of naming a plausible source.