US CSL (EL)
Active- Programme
- Entity List (EL) - Bureau of Industry and Security
- Designated
- 16 Mar 2020
- Legal basis
- 85 FR 14794
- Source
- US Consolidated Screening List
- Last confirmed
- 19 Oct 2026
- Document
- Open the original ↗
CompanyWholesale of other machinery and equipmentReg. 1167746298653Last read from source 19 Oct 2026
Entity List (EL) - Bureau of Industry and Security
Designated 16 Mar 2020 · US Consolidated Screening List
RUSSIA-EO14024
Designation date not published by this authority · OFAC SDN
No corporate ownership records on file for this company. Ownership is recorded only where a register or a designating authority publishes it, and coverage is thin for companies outside the jurisdictions with open beneficial-ownership registers.
No people recorded against this company. Officer and ownership data comes from national business registers, and the registers this system reads cover a different set of countries from the sanctions lists — so a sanctioned company frequently has none.
Identifier recorded: REG_NUMBER HRB 54238
19 Oct 2026 · GLEIF
Identifier recorded: LEI 391200OI94C3AIN9RX69
19 Oct 2026 · GLEIF
Alias recorded: Technomar GmbH
19 Oct 2026 · GLEIF
Sanction listed: US CSL (EL) — Entity List (EL) - Bureau of Industry and Security
21 Jul 2026 · US Consolidated Screening List
Alias recorded: Tehnomar
21 Jul 2026 · US Consolidated Screening List
Alias recorded: Technomar
21 Jul 2026 · US Consolidated Screening List
No ownership test is on file for this company. The test reads who holds a company's shares from its shareholder register, and it is run each day for companies with a number in Estonia's, Latvia's or Poland's register. For a company anywhere else, no register read here states its shareholders, so the test cannot be run.
No corporate ownership records on file. This is an absence of evidence, not evidence of a simple structure — see the risk breakdown, where the ownership component is left unscored for exactly this reason.
No people recorded against this company. Officer data comes from national business registers, and a company outside those jurisdictions will have none here even when its officers are publicly known elsewhere.
Nothing to draw: this company has no recorded links to another company on file.
No other company on file shares 14-60 Vorotynskaya, Moscow.
Identifier recorded: REG_NUMBER HRB 54238
19 Oct 2026 · GLEIF
Identifier recorded: LEI 391200OI94C3AIN9RX69
19 Oct 2026 · GLEIF
Alias recorded: Technomar GmbH
19 Oct 2026 · GLEIF
Sanction listed: US CSL (EL) — Entity List (EL) - Bureau of Industry and Security
21 Jul 2026 · US Consolidated Screening List
Alias recorded: Tehnomar
21 Jul 2026 · US Consolidated Screening List
Alias recorded: Technomar
21 Jul 2026 · US Consolidated Screening List
Sanction listed: OFAC — RUSSIA-EO14024
17 Jul 2026 · OFAC SDN
Identifier recorded: REG_NUMBER 1167746298653
17 Jul 2026 · OFAC SDN
Identifier recorded: TAX_ID 7733276404
17 Jul 2026 · OFAC SDN
Alias recorded: OOO TEXHOMAP
17 Jul 2026 · OFAC SDN
Alias recorded: OOO TEKHNOMAR
17 Jul 2026 · OFAC SDN
Alias recorded: OBSHCHESTVO S OGRANICHENNOY OTVETSTVENNOSTYU TEKHNOMAR
17 Jul 2026 · OFAC SDN
Alias recorded: TEHNOMAR
17 Jul 2026 · OFAC SDN
Alias recorded: TECHNOMAR
17 Jul 2026 · OFAC SDN
First recorded: TECHNOMAR
17 Jul 2026
Dates are when each fact was first recorded here, which for older entries is when the source was first read rather than when the authority acted. Changes across all companies ›
No published story on this site mentions this company. Mentions are linked only where a published article names a company already resolved here, and the published set is small — so an empty section says nothing about how much has been written elsewhere.
Sanctions and debarments: 68 · Ownership risk: not scored · Jurisdiction: 70 · Evidence coverage: 60 · Adverse media: not scored
Sanctions exposure: 68 · Ownership risk: not scored · Jurisdiction: 70 · Adverse media: not scored
Sanctions exposure: 68 · Ownership risk: not scored · Jurisdiction: 70 · Adverse media: not scored
Each reading is kept with the methodology version that produced it. A later reading is not a correction of an earlier one — it is a different question asked of more sources.
Fact
reg_number:HRB 54238
Registered identifier
Evidence
391200OI94C3AIN9RX69
Read 19 Oct 2026
Fact
lei:391200OI94C3AIN9RX69
Registered identifier
Evidence
391200OI94C3AIN9RX69
Read 19 Oct 2026
Fact
reg_number:1167746298653
Registered identifier
Evidence
50497
Read 28 Aug 2026 · asserted by 2 records
Fact
tax_id:7733276404
Registered identifier
Evidence
50497
Read 28 Aug 2026 · asserted by 2 records
Fact
technomar
Legal name
Evidence
391200OI94C3AIN9RX69
Read 19 Oct 2026 · asserted by 3 records
Fact
RU
Jurisdiction
Evidence
50497
Read 28 Aug 2026 · asserted by 2 records
Fact
OFAC — RUSSIA-EO14024
Designation
Evidence
50497
Read 28 Aug 2026 · asserted by 2 records
Fact
US CSL (EL) — Entity List (EL) - Bureau of Industry and Security
Designation
Evidence
EL-a3c769c025ede81fbf31f58693a5f07e499077390640efffafe93a76
Read 28 Aug 2026 · asserted by 2 records
Both readings are shown because both were published. Neither is corrected here.
No company register for this jurisdiction has been connected to this system, and none has been examined.
No company register for this jurisdiction has been connected to this system, and none has been examined.
Records from these sources are matched into one company only on a shared identifier, or by a human reviewer — never on name similarity alone. How this works. Not legal or compliance advice: check the originals before acting on anything here.
14 records on this company — identifiers, aliases, officers, listings, figures — each carry the source that wrote them and are shown beside their own entries. The fields above are different: the entities table has no source column, so what is shown is every source whose stored payload contains the value verbatim. That is strong evidence, not proof of which write landed it, and where nothing contains the value the row says so instead of naming a plausible source.