al-Hamza Division

• SanctionsRecords foundSanctioned by 1 authority: UK OFSI. Confirmed present in a source snapshot within the last 90 days.
• Debarment & exclusion— Checked, nothing found16 sources read, none holding a record for this company.
• Ownership & controlRecords found1 designated individual recorded in connection with this company: Sayf Boulad ABU BAKR.
• People— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.
• Identity & registration— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.
• Jurisdiction— Not scoredNot scored. No country is recorded for this record.
• Court records— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.

• UK OFSIActive

  Syria

  Designated 19 Dec 2025 · UK Sanctions List (FCDO)

No corporate ownership records on file for this company. Ownership is recorded only where a register or a designating authority publishes it, and coverage is thin for companies outside the jurisdictions with open beneficial-ownership registers.

Legal name

al-Hamza Division

Also known as

فرقة الحمزة · al-Hamza Division · HAMZA DIVISION · Hamzat Division

First recorded here

28 Aug 2026

1. Alias recorded: فرقة الحمزة

   13 Sept 2026 · UK Sanctions List (FCDO)

2. Sanctioned individual connected by OFAC: Sayf Boulad ABU BAKR

   28 Aug 2026 · OFAC SDN

3. Sanction listed: UK OFSI — Syria

   28 Aug 2026 · UK OFSI Consolidated List

4. Alias recorded: Hamzat Division

   28 Aug 2026 · UK OFSI Consolidated List

5. Alias recorded: HAMZA DIVISION

   28 Aug 2026 · UK OFSI Consolidated List

6. Alias recorded: al-Hamza Division

   28 Aug 2026 · UK OFSI Consolidated List

No ownership test is on file for this company. The test reads who holds a company's shares from its shareholder register, and it is run each day for companies with a number in Estonia's, Latvia's or Poland's register. For a company anywhere else, no register read here states its shareholders, so the test cannot be run.

No corporate ownership records on file. This is an absence of evidence, not evidence of a simple structure — see the risk breakdown, where the ownership component is left unscored for exactly this reason.

None recorded with a stated ownership stake or control method.

Nothing to draw: this company has no recorded links to another company on file.

No address has been read for this company, so this was never checked — which is not the same as finding nothing.

Each reading is kept with the methodology version that produced it. A later reading is not a correction of an earlier one — it is a different question asked of more sources.

• Fact

  hamza division

  Legal name

  Evidence

  17254

  Read 13 Sept 2026

  Source

  UK Sanctions List (FCDO)

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  al-hamza division

  Legal name

  Evidence

  17254

  Read 28 Aug 2026

  Source

  UK OFSI Consolidated List

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  UK OFSI — Syria

  Designation

  Evidence

  17254

  Read 13 Sept 2026 · asserted by 2 records

  Source

  UK Sanctions List (FCDO) and 1 other source

  Primary source ↗

Records from these sources are matched into one company only on a shared identifier, or by a human reviewer — never on name similarity alone. How this works. Not legal or compliance advice: check the originals before acting on anything here.

TRUE

A source states it. Rendered as a fact, with the source attached.

FALSE

A source explicitly denies it. Rare, and never inferred from silence.

UNKNOWN

Checked, nothing found. Rendered as an em dash, never as 0 or "no".

NOT_ASSESSED

Never checked — nothing was read here. Excluded from coverage, and not counted as clean.

6 records on this company — identifiers, aliases, officers, listings, figures — each carry the source that wrote them and are shown beside their own entries. The fields above are different: the entities table has no source column, so what is shown is every source whose stored payload contains the value verbatim. That is strong evidence, not proof of which write landed it, and where nothing contains the value the row says so instead of naming a plausible source.