LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP DA GROUP 22

• SanctionsRecords foundSanctioned by 1 authority: OFAC. Confirmed present in a source snapshot within the last 90 days.
• Debarment & exclusion— Checked, nothing found16 sources read, none holding a record for this company.
• Ownership & controlRecords foundOwns or controls 1 designated company: ELIX ST LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY.
• People— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.
• Identity & registration— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.
• Jurisdiction— Not scoredNot scored. The jurisdiction lists this system reads are: EU list of high-risk third countries (AMLD Art. 9). Each names specific countries, so absence from them is not a clearance of Kazakhstan. Separately, 10 of the sanctions authorities this system reads have designated companies registered in Kazakhstan — a count of this corpus, not a rating of the jurisdiction.
• Court records— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.

• OFACActive

  RUSSIA-EO14024

  Designation date not published by this authority · OFAC SDN

No people recorded against this company. Officer and ownership data comes from national business registers, and the registers this system reads cover a different set of countries from the sanctions lists — so a sanctioned company frequently has none.

Legal name

LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP DA GROUP 22

Also known as

LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP DA GROUP 22

Jurisdiction

KZ

First recorded here

18 Jul 2026

1. Subsidiary recorded: ELIX ST LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

   12 Aug 2026 · OFAC SDN

2. Sanction listed: OFAC — RUSSIA-EO14024

   18 Jul 2026 · OFAC SDN

3. Alias recorded: LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP DA GROUP 22

   18 Jul 2026 · OFAC SDN

4. First recorded: LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP DA GROUP 22

   18 Jul 2026

No ownership test is on file for this company. The test reads who holds a company's shares from its shareholder register, and it is run each day for companies with a number in Estonia's, Latvia's or Poland's register. For a company anywhere else, no register read here states its shareholders, so the test cannot be run.

No people recorded against this company. Officer data comes from national business registers, and a company outside those jurisdictions will have none here even when its officers are publicly known elsewhere.

2 companies, 1 recorded links, up to two steps from this record. Open the full graph ›

No address has been read for this company, so this was never checked — which is not the same as finding nothing.

Each reading is kept with the methodology version that produced it. A later reading is not a correction of an earlier one — it is a different question asked of more sources.

• Fact

  liability partnership da group 22

  Legal name

  Evidence

  47923

  Read 28 Aug 2026

  Source

  OFAC SDN

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  KZ

  Jurisdiction

  Evidence

  47923

  Read 28 Aug 2026

  Source

  OFAC SDN

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  OFAC — RUSSIA-EO14024

  Designation

  Evidence

  47923

  Read 28 Aug 2026 · asserted by 2 records

  Source

  OFAC SDN

  Primary source ↗

Records from these sources are matched into one company only on a shared identifier, or by a human reviewer — never on name similarity alone. How this works. Not legal or compliance advice: check the originals before acting on anything here.

TRUE

A source states it. Rendered as a fact, with the source attached.

FALSE

A source explicitly denies it. Rare, and never inferred from silence.

UNKNOWN

Checked, nothing found. Rendered as an em dash, never as 0 or "no".

NOT_ASSESSED

Never checked — nothing was read here. Excluded from coverage, and not counted as clean.

2 records on this company — identifiers, aliases, officers, listings, figures — each carry the source that wrote them and are shown beside their own entries. The fields above are different: the entities table has no source column, so what is shown is every source whose stored payload contains the value verbatim. That is strong evidence, not proof of which write landed it, and where nothing contains the value the row says so instead of naming a plausible source.