Aerospace Industries Organization (AIO)

• Sanctions— Checked, nothing foundNo sanctions listing in force. Earlier listings are on file, since lifted or expired.
• Debarment & exclusion— Checked, nothing found16 sources read, none holding a record for this company.
• Ownership & controlRecords foundOwns or controls 1 designated company: SHAHID HEMMAT INDUSTRIAL GROUP (SHIG).
• People— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.
• Identity & registration— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.
• Jurisdiction— Not scoredNot scored. No country is recorded for this record.
• Court records— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.

No active sanctions listing from any of the authorities this system reads.

No people recorded against this company. Officer and ownership data comes from national business registers, and the registers this system reads cover a different set of countries from the sanctions lists — so a sanctioned company frequently has none.

Legal name

Aerospace Industries Organization (AIO)

Also known as

Aerospace Industries Organization (AIO)

First recorded here

28 Aug 2026

1. Sanction lifted: US CSL (ISN) — E.O. 13382

   5 Oct 2026 · US Consolidated Screening List

2. Subsidiary recorded: SHAHID HEMMAT INDUSTRIAL GROUP (SHIG)

   10 Sept 2026 · UK OFSI Consolidated List

3. Sanction listed: US CSL (ISN) — E.O. 13382

   28 Aug 2026 · US Consolidated Screening List

4. Alias recorded: Aerospace Industries Organization (AIO)

   28 Aug 2026 · US Consolidated Screening List

5. First recorded: Aerospace Industries Organization (AIO)

   28 Aug 2026 · US Consolidated Screening List

No ownership test is on file for this company. The test reads who holds a company's shares from its shareholder register, and it is run each day for companies with a number in Estonia's, Latvia's or Poland's register. For a company anywhere else, no register read here states its shareholders, so the test cannot be run.

No people recorded against this company. Officer data comes from national business registers, and a company outside those jurisdictions will have none here even when its officers are publicly known elsewhere.

No sanctions listing in force on file.

7 companies, 6 recorded links, up to two steps from this record. Open the full graph ›

No address has been read for this company, so this was never checked — which is not the same as finding nothing.

Each reading is kept with the methodology version that produced it. A later reading is not a correction of an earlier one — it is a different question asked of more sources.

• Fact

  aerospace industries organization (aio)

  Legal name

  Evidence

  ISN-c67d09bcc65dcfa92faca306bc82f06d790adc224f5c9ebdf38ce09f

  Read 28 Aug 2026

  Source

  US Consolidated Screening List

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  US CSL (ISN) — E.O. 13382

  Designation

  Evidence

  ISN-c67d09bcc65dcfa92faca306bc82f06d790adc224f5c9ebdf38ce09f

  Read 28 Aug 2026

  Source

  US Consolidated Screening List

  Primary source ↗

Records from these sources are matched into one company only on a shared identifier, or by a human reviewer — never on name similarity alone. How this works. Not legal or compliance advice: check the originals before acting on anything here.

TRUE

A source states it. Rendered as a fact, with the source attached.

FALSE

A source explicitly denies it. Rare, and never inferred from silence.

UNKNOWN

Checked, nothing found. Rendered as an em dash, never as 0 or "no".

NOT_ASSESSED

Never checked — nothing was read here. Excluded from coverage, and not counted as clean.

2 records on this company — identifiers, aliases, officers, listings, figures — each carry the source that wrote them and are shown beside their own entries. The fields above are different: the entities table has no source column, so what is shown is every source whose stored payload contains the value verbatim. That is strong evidence, not proof of which write landed it, and where nothing contains the value the row says so instead of naming a plausible source.