Ownership test · EU owning or controlling
No designated holder found where the chain could be followed; it breaks at 2 points
About CHEMAGROTRADE POLSKA Spółka z o.o., assessed under PL number 0000961269.
First said on 18 Sept 2026, last confirmed on 24 Oct 2026. It is the current verdict under this rule. A daily run that reaches the same verdict on the same holdings, listings and breaks confirms it. When anything it rests on changes, a new verdict begins at a new address.
What it says
No party listed under this regime was found on the part of the chain that could be followed. The chain breaks at 2 points, and past a break nothing is known. Natural persons hold one holding in the chain, including 95% of the company directly. The register publishes that person's name masked, so it was compared with no designated person.
- Designated share
- None found
- Threshold
- 50% or more
- Chain
- Breaks at 2 points
- Nearest designated party
- The company is itself designated.Found across every list on file, not only those this rule counts.
Notes
- 1 natural-person holding is published with a masked name and was compared with nobody.
- Natural-person holders are compared with designated persons by name only. A match is reported and never counted, because the registers publish no identifier that could confirm it.
The chain
Holdings the result passes through
None: no holding carries a designated party's share down to the company.
Holdings read
1 holding was read in the chain, and its holder is not published as a company. Natural persons hold 1 of them, including 95% of the company directly. 1 is published with the name masked. A verdict never keeps a person's name: a person appears in it as a holding of a stated share.
Listed parties in the chain
CHEMAGROTRADE POLSKA Spółka z o.o. (PL 0000961269) the company itself
- Not countedPoland MSWiA sanctions list
Asset freeze under Poland, a. zamrożenie funduszy zgromadzonych na rachunkach bankowych, b. zakaz udostępniania podmiotowi wpisanemu na listę lub na jego rzecz - bezpośrednio lub pośrednio – jakichkolwiek fu
Listed on 7 Dec 2023 as CHEMAGROTRADE POLSKA Spółka z o.o.
Not counted: this regime's ownership rule has not been read here.
Where the chain breaks
The chain could not be followed past 2 points, and past a break nothing is known. An answer about the chain covers only the part before them.
- Person's name masked: 1
- Holders the register leaves out: 1
Holders the register leaves out at the company itself, 5% of it
The holders the KRS lists hold 95% of the capital. The other 5% belongs to holders of under 10% each, whom the KRS does not publish.
Person's name masked at the company itself, 95% of it
A person holding 95% is published with the name masked, so whether that person is designated cannot be asked at all.
What it rested on
Lists this rule reads
EU Consolidated Sanctions List
Read on 13 Sept 2026; dated 5 Aug 2026 by the publisher.
Shareholder registers
Poland KRS (current extract, read on demand)
Asked when the verdict was computed. The holdings used were read on 18 Sept 2026.
The rule
- Test
- EU owning or controlling
- Threshold
- 50% or more
- Several designated owners
- Added together: the shares of different designated parties count as one.
- A jointly held share
- The texts read do not settle it, so a result that rests on one goes to a reviewer.
- Control
- Not assessed. A shareholder register shows shares, not board seats or agreements.
- Signed off
- On 17 Sept 2026, from texts read on 13 Sept 2026.
f3d899fc1d224a36dbf3880253f4312f1c7fcc70e367d56af13ffb8b20bd8c88
Caveats
- Ownership raises a presumption that the listed person controls the entity and its assets. The entity may rebut it case by case.
- Regulations 269/2014 and 2580/2001 define owning and controlling themselves. For the other EU regimes read here, the same test is the one the Council sets out in its Best Practices, which are not legally binding.
- The Commission says control over an entity also reaches that entity's own subsidiaries, but publishes no worked example with percentages. A company owned at the threshold is treated as holding its own shares for the listed person on that basis.
- Control without the threshold stake is part of this test and cannot be read from a shareholder register, so an outcome short of the threshold does not mean the company is not controlled.
- 1 party in this chain is listed under a regime whose ownership rule has not been verified here, and was not counted: CHEMAGROTRADE POLSKA Spółka z o.o. (Poland MSWiA sanctions list).
Texts the rule rests on
- Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, Article 1, as amended by Council Regulation (EU) 2025/2037 of 23 October 2025
Article 1, points (i) "owning": 50% or more of the proprietary rights, and (j) "controlling"
- Council of the European Union, EU Best Practices for the effective implementation of restrictive measures, document 11623/24 of 3 July 2024
Paragraph 62 (the freeze reaches assets of entities owned or controlled by a listed person), 63 (owned: 50% or more of the proprietary rights, holdings of listed persons aggregated), 64 to 66 (control criteria, rebuttable) and 68 (funds made available to an owned or controlled entity are made available indirectly to the listed person). Applied to each EU regime in EU_REGULATIONS_READ.
- Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001, Article 1
Article 1, points (k) "owning": 50% or more of the proprietary rights or a majority interest, and (l) "controlling"
- European Commission, Frequently asked questions: asset freeze under Council Regulation 269/2014 (as of 6 May 2026)
Question 1 (presumption that control extends to the assets of an owned or controlled entity, rebuttable), Question 8 (aggregated ownership of several listed persons) and Question 9 (control over one entity reaches its own subsidiaries)
This record
- Address
- This page's address does not change, and the verdict at it is never rewritten. The same record as JSON.
- Computed
- 18 Sept 2026
- Identity
084b08872fd08695b7e26a3c0a216d1c885149752d25ec9b20807a86bcc7169bA hash of what the verdict rests on. Each run compares it to decide whether the verdict still stands.