Ownership test · EU owning or controlling
No designated holder found where the chain could be followed; it breaks at 1 point
About ROSETTA GAMING SPOLKA Z OGRANICZONA ODPOWIEDZIALNOSCIA, assessed under PL number KRS0000756864.
First said on 17 Sept 2026, and replaced on 18 Sept 2026. A daily run that reaches the same verdict on the same holdings, listings and breaks confirms it. When anything it rests on changes, a new verdict begins at a new address.
- Before it, from 16 Sept 2026 to 17 Sept 2026: “No designated holder found where the chain could be followed; it breaks at 1 point”
- After it, from 18 Sept 2026 and still current: “No designated holder found where the chain could be followed; it breaks at 1 point”
The words can stay the same across two verdicts: a verdict is replaced when a holding, a listing, a break or the signed rule table changes, even where its words do not.
What it says
No party listed under this regime was found on the part of the chain that could be followed. The chain breaks at 1 point, and past a break nothing is known. Natural persons hold one holding in the chain, including 100% of the company directly. The register publishes that person's name masked, so it was compared with no designated person.
- Designated share
- None found
- Threshold
- 50% or more
- Chain
- Breaks at 1 point
- Nearest designated party
- The company is itself designated.Found across every list on file, not only those this rule counts.
Notes
- 1 natural-person holding is published with a masked name and was compared with nobody.
- Natural-person holders are compared with designated persons by name only. A match is reported and never counted, because the registers publish no identifier that could confirm it.
The chain
Holdings the result passes through
None: no holding carries a designated party's share down to the company.
Holdings read
1 holding was read in the chain, and its holder is not published as a company. Natural persons hold 1 of them, including 100% of the company directly. 1 is published with the name masked. A verdict never keeps a person's name: a person appears in it as a holding of a stated share.
Listed parties in the chain
ROSETTA GAMING SPOLKA Z OGRANICZONA ODPOWIEDZIALNOSCIA (PL KRS0000756864) the company itself
- Not countedOFAC SDN
Asset freeze under OFAC, TCO
Listed as ROSETTA GAMING SPOLKA Z OGRANICZONA ODPOWIEDZIALNOSCIA
Not counted here: this list is read under the OFAC 50 percent rule rule.
Where the chain breaks
The chain could not be followed past 1 point, and past a break nothing is known. An answer about the chain covers only the part before them.
- Person's name masked: 1
Person's name masked at the company itself, 100% of it
A person holding 100% is published with the name masked, so whether that person is designated cannot be asked at all.
What it rested on
Lists this rule reads
EU Consolidated Sanctions List
Read on 13 Sept 2026; dated 5 Aug 2026 by the publisher.
Shareholder registers
Poland KRS (current extract, read on demand)
Asked when the verdict was computed. The holdings used were read on 17 Sept 2026.
The rule
- Test
- EU owning or controlling
- Threshold
- 50% or more
- Several designated owners
- Added together: the shares of different designated parties count as one.
- A jointly held share
- The texts read do not settle it, so a result that rests on one goes to a reviewer.
- Control
- Not assessed. A shareholder register shows shares, not board seats or agreements.
- Signed off
- On 17 Sept 2026, from texts read on 13 Sept 2026.
ec7b82da98b4465749dfa0023ce7812d6c965f69d72df13ea7a20870d93698b0
Caveats
- Ownership raises a presumption that the listed person controls the entity and its assets. The entity may rebut it case by case.
- Regulations 269/2014 and 2580/2001 define owning and controlling themselves. For the other EU regimes read here, the same test is the one the Council sets out in its Best Practices, which are not legally binding.
- The Commission says control over an entity also reaches that entity's own subsidiaries, but publishes no worked example with percentages. A company owned at the threshold is treated as holding its own shares for the listed person on that basis.
- Control without the threshold stake is part of this test and cannot be read from a shareholder register, so an outcome short of the threshold does not mean the company is not controlled.
Texts the rule rests on
- Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, Article 1, as amended by Council Regulation (EU) 2025/2037 of 23 October 2025
Article 1, points (i) "owning": 50% or more of the proprietary rights, and (j) "controlling"
- Council of the European Union, EU Best Practices for the effective implementation of restrictive measures, document 11623/24 of 3 July 2024
Paragraph 62 (the freeze reaches assets of entities owned or controlled by a listed person), 63 (owned: 50% or more of the proprietary rights, holdings of listed persons aggregated), 64 to 66 (control criteria, rebuttable) and 68 (funds made available to an owned or controlled entity are made available indirectly to the listed person). Applied to each EU regime in EU_REGULATIONS_READ.
- Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001, Article 1
Article 1, points (k) "owning": 50% or more of the proprietary rights or a majority interest, and (l) "controlling"
- European Commission, Frequently asked questions: asset freeze under Council Regulation 269/2014 (as of 6 May 2026)
Question 1 (presumption that control extends to the assets of an owned or controlled entity, rebuttable), Question 8 (aggregated ownership of several listed persons) and Question 9 (control over one entity reaches its own subsidiaries)
This record
- Address
- This page's address does not change, and the verdict at it is never rewritten. The same record as JSON.
- Computed
- 17 Sept 2026
- Identity
4b1dac791ada78d0a5f471815cdcca6c6a173d96baa5505bf39ab09426f00865A hash of what the verdict rests on. Each run compares it to decide whether the verdict still stands.