Ownership test · OFAC 50 percent rule
Designated itself, so blocked
About CALLLYNC SPOLKA Z OGRANICZONA ODPOWIEDZIALNOSCIA, assessed under PL number 0001070994.
First said on 18 Sept 2026, last confirmed on 24 Oct 2026. It is the current verdict under this rule. A daily run that reaches the same verdict on the same holdings, listings and breaks confirms it. When anything it rests on changes, a new verdict begins at a new address.
- Before it, from 17 Sept 2026 to 18 Sept 2026: “Designated itself, so blocked”
The words can stay the same across two verdicts: a verdict is replaced when a holding, a listing, a break or the signed rule table changes, even where its words do not.
What it says
The company is itself listed under this regime, and blocked as a listed party rather than through its owners.
- Designated share
- Listed itself
- Threshold
- 50% or more
- Effect
- Blocked
- Chain
- Breaks at 2 points
- Nearest designated party
- The company is itself designated.Found across every list on file, not only those this rule counts.
Notes
- 2 natural-person holdings are published with a masked name and were compared with nobody.
- Natural-person holders are compared with designated persons by name only. A match is reported and never counted, because the registers publish no identifier that could confirm it.
The chain
Holdings the result passes through
None: the company is listed itself, so the verdict does not pass through any holding.
Holdings read
2 holdings were read in the chain, none of them held by a company. Natural persons hold 2 of them, including 100% of the company directly. 2 are published with the name masked. A verdict never keeps a person's name: a person appears in it as a holding of a stated share.
Listed parties in the chain
CALLLYNC SPOLKA Z OGRANICZONA ODPOWIEDZIALNOSCIA (PL 0001070994) the company itself
- CountedOFAC SDN
Asset freeze under OFAC, SDGT
Listed as CALLLYNC SPOLKA Z OGRANICZONA ODPOWIEDZIALNOSCIA
Counted under this rule.
Where the chain breaks
The chain could not be followed past 2 points, and past a break nothing is known. This verdict does not rest on the chain, because the company is listed itself; the breaks are kept with it all the same.
- Person's name masked: 2
Person's name masked at the company itself, 50% of it
A person holding 50% is published with the name masked, so whether that person is designated cannot be asked at all.
Person's name masked at the company itself, 50% of it
A person holding 50% is published with the name masked, so whether that person is designated cannot be asked at all.
What it rested on
Lists this rule reads
OFAC SDN
Read on 13 Sept 2026; dated 10 Sept 2026 by the publisher.
Shareholder registers
Poland KRS (current extract, read on demand)
Asked when the verdict was computed. The holdings used were read on 18 Sept 2026.
The rule
- Test
- OFAC 50 percent rule
- Threshold
- 50% or more
- Several designated owners
- Added together: the shares of different designated parties count as one.
- A jointly held share
- The texts read do not settle it, so a result that rests on one goes to a reviewer.
- Control
- Not assessed. A shareholder register shows shares, not board seats or agreements.
- Signed off
- On 17 Sept 2026, from texts read on 13 Sept 2026.
f3d899fc1d224a36dbf3880253f4312f1c7fcc70e367d56af13ffb8b20bd8c88
Caveats
- The rule speaks only to ownership. An entity controlled by a blocked person without being owned 50% or more is not blocked by it, though it may be designated in its own right.
Texts the rule rests on
- OFAC, Frequently Asked Questions: Entities Owned by Blocked Persons (50% Rule)
FAQ 398 (ownership, not control), FAQ 399 (50 percent or more in the aggregate; two blocked persons at 25% each block the entity), FAQ 401 (indirect ownership: an entity 50% owned by a blocked entity is blocked and its holdings count in full)
This record
- Address
- This page's address does not change, and the verdict at it is never rewritten. The same record as JSON.
- Computed
- 18 Sept 2026
- Identity
68404043d4538ab66af7fc8b3985f659dc0b43a37d43526b8aca4cdd5a369679A hash of what the verdict rests on. Each run compares it to decide whether the verdict still stands.