Ownership test · Swiss ownership and control
No designated holder found where the chain could be followed; it breaks at 1 point
About ROSETTA GAMING SPOLKA Z OGRANICZONA ODPOWIEDZIALNOSCIA, assessed under PL number KRS0000756864.
First said on 17 Sept 2026, and replaced on 18 Sept 2026. A daily run that reaches the same verdict on the same holdings, listings and breaks confirms it. When anything it rests on changes, a new verdict begins at a new address.
- After it, from 18 Sept 2026 and still current: “No designated holder found where the chain could be followed; it breaks at 1 point”
The words can stay the same across two verdicts: a verdict is replaced when a holding, a listing, a break or the signed rule table changes, even where its words do not.
What it says
No party listed under this regime was found on the part of the chain that could be followed. The chain breaks at 1 point, and past a break nothing is known. Natural persons hold one holding in the chain, including 100% of the company directly. The register publishes that person's name masked, so it was compared with no designated person.
- Designated share
- None found
- Threshold
- 50% or more
- Chain
- Breaks at 1 point
- Nearest designated party
- The company is itself designated.Found across every list on file, not only those this rule counts.
Notes
- 1 natural-person holding is published with a masked name and was compared with nobody.
- Natural-person holders are compared with designated persons by name only. A match is reported and never counted, because the registers publish no identifier that could confirm it.
The chain
Holdings the result passes through
None: no holding carries a designated party's share down to the company.
Holdings read
1 holding was read in the chain, and its holder is not published as a company. Natural persons hold 1 of them, including 100% of the company directly. 1 is published with the name masked. A verdict never keeps a person's name: a person appears in it as a holding of a stated share.
Listed parties in the chain
ROSETTA GAMING SPOLKA Z OGRANICZONA ODPOWIEDZIALNOSCIA (PL KRS0000756864) the company itself
- Not countedOFAC SDN
Asset freeze under OFAC, TCO
Listed as ROSETTA GAMING SPOLKA Z OGRANICZONA ODPOWIEDZIALNOSCIA
Not counted here: this list is read under the OFAC 50 percent rule rule.
Where the chain breaks
The chain could not be followed past 1 point, and past a break nothing is known. An answer about the chain covers only the part before them.
- Person's name masked: 1
Person's name masked at the company itself, 100% of it
A person holding 100% is published with the name masked, so whether that person is designated cannot be asked at all.
What it rested on
Lists this rule reads
Switzerland SECO Sanctions List
Read on 16 Sept 2026; dated 4 Sept 2026 by the publisher.
Shareholder registers
Poland KRS (current extract, read on demand)
Asked when the verdict was computed. The holdings used were read on 17 Sept 2026.
The rule
- Test
- Swiss ownership and control
- Threshold
- 50% or more
- Several designated owners
- Added together: the shares of different designated parties count as one.
- A jointly held share
- The texts read do not settle it, so a result that rests on one goes to a reviewer.
- Control
- Not assessed. A shareholder register shows shares, not board seats or agreements.
- Signed off
- On 17 Sept 2026, from texts read on 13 Sept 2026.
ec7b82da98b4465749dfa0023ce7812d6c965f69d72df13ea7a20870d93698b0
Caveats
- What owning and controlling mean is set out in SECO's guidance on the sanctions ordinances, which SECO says is not legally binding.
- SECO adds the holdings of several sanctioned parties together "in principle" (grundsätzlich).
- Control raises a presumption that the company may rebut case by case.
- SECO counts holdings held directly or indirectly, and publishes no worked example with percentages. A company owned at the threshold is treated as holding its own shares for the listed party, as under the EU test.
- Control without the threshold stake is part of this test and cannot be read from a shareholder register, so an outcome short of the threshold does not mean the company is not controlled.
Texts the rule rests on
- SECO, Auslegungshilfe Sanktionsmassnahmen (Stand 30. Juni 2026)
Chapter 1, which applies to every sanctions ordinance that freezes funds: 1.10 (owning: 50% or more of the ownership interests, directly or indirectly; the interests of several sanctioned parties added together in principle) and 1.11 (control: any one of criteria a to h, unless the contrary is shown in the case)
- The Swiss sanctions ordinances in SWISS_ORDINANCES_READ, as consolidated on fedlex
The freeze article of each, which freezes the funds and economic resources owned or controlled by the listed parties, by parties acting on their behalf, and by companies and organisations those parties own or control
This record
- Address
- This page's address does not change, and the verdict at it is never rewritten. The same record as JSON.
- Computed
- 17 Sept 2026
- Identity
36e871765b2ace4ac43bd2e23fd112db678b4bdbe0c6ffed4e26ffbc03181ff4A hash of what the verdict rests on. Each run compares it to decide whether the verdict still stands.