Chemical Industries Group

• SanctionsRecords foundSanctioned by 1 authority: UK OFSI. Confirmed present in a source snapshot within the last 90 days.
• Debarment & exclusion— Checked, nothing found16 sources read, none holding a record for this company.
• Ownership & controlRecords foundControlled by a designated company: DEFENCE INDUSTRIES ORGANISATION (DIO).
• People— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.
• Identity & registration— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.
• Jurisdiction— Not scoredNot scored. No country is recorded for this record.
• Court records— Not assessedNothing has been read for this company on this dimension.

• UK OFSIActive

  Iran (Nuclear)

  Designated 18 Oct 2023 · UK Sanctions List (FCDO)

Legal name

Chemical Industries Group

Also known as

Chemical Industries Group · Parchin Chemical Factories · PARCHIN CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES · PCI

First recorded here

28 Aug 2026

1. Parent company recorded: DEFENCE INDUSTRIES ORGANISATION (DIO)

   11 Sept 2026 · UK OFSI Consolidated List

2. Sanctioned individual connected by OFAC: Mostafa ROSTAMI SANI

   10 Sept 2026 · OFAC SDN

3. Sanctioned individual connected by OFAC: Vahid QAYUMI

   10 Sept 2026 · OFAC SDN

4. Sanctioned individual connected by OFAC: Majid DOLATKHAH

   10 Sept 2026 · OFAC SDN

5. Sanctioned individual connected by OFAC: Marco KLINGE

   10 Sept 2026 · OFAC SDN

6. Sanction listed: UK OFSI — Iran (Nuclear)

   28 Aug 2026 · UK OFSI Consolidated List

No ownership test is on file for this company. The test reads who holds a company's shares from its shareholder register, and it is run each day for companies with a number in Estonia's, Latvia's or Poland's register. For a company anywhere else, no register read here states its shareholders, so the test cannot be run.

None recorded with a stated ownership stake or control method.

Matched on the name as each register spells it, not on a resolved person. Where the name is common the match means little, and the label says so rather than leaving you to guess.

7 companies, 6 recorded links, up to two steps from this record. Open the full graph ›

No address has been read for this company, so this was never checked — which is not the same as finding nothing.

Each reading is kept with the methodology version that produced it. A later reading is not a correction of an earlier one — it is a different question asked of more sources.

• Fact

  parchin chemical industries

  Legal name

  Evidence

  16136

  Read 13 Sept 2026

  Source

  UK Sanctions List (FCDO)

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  chemical industries group

  Legal name

  Evidence

  16136

  Read 28 Aug 2026

  Source

  UK OFSI Consolidated List

  Primary source ↗

• Fact

  UK OFSI — Iran (Nuclear)

  Designation

  Evidence

  16136

  Read 13 Sept 2026 · asserted by 2 records

  Source

  UK Sanctions List (FCDO) and 1 other source

  Primary source ↗

Records from these sources are matched into one company only on a shared identifier, or by a human reviewer — never on name similarity alone. How this works. Not legal or compliance advice: check the originals before acting on anything here.

TRUE

A source states it. Rendered as a fact, with the source attached.

FALSE

A source explicitly denies it. Rare, and never inferred from silence.

UNKNOWN

Checked, nothing found. Rendered as an em dash, never as 0 or "no".

NOT_ASSESSED

Never checked — nothing was read here. Excluded from coverage, and not counted as clean.

9 records on this company — identifiers, aliases, officers, listings, figures — each carry the source that wrote them and are shown beside their own entries. The fields above are different: the entities table has no source column, so what is shown is every source whose stored payload contains the value verbatim. That is strong evidence, not proof of which write landed it, and where nothing contains the value the row says so instead of naming a plausible source.