Apolitics · https://apolika.com
Evidence file
FUNDS AVENUE S.A.
What this system held and said about the company on 24 October 2026, as of the moment the file was made, and what it rested on. Made on 24 October 2026, 19:52 UTC.
- listing in force
- 1
- ownership verdicts
- 0
- source with its version
- 1
- limits stated
- 2
Listings
- LiftedCommission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF)
Debarment
- In this state since
- 12 Sept 2026
- Designated
- 19 Dec 2024
- Reason given
- En date du 19 décembre 2024, la CSSF a prononcé une amende d’ordre d’un montant de 696.547 euros au total à l’encontre du gestionnaire de fonds d’investissement Funds Avenue S.A. (le “GFI”), soumis aux dispositions du chapitre 15 de la loi modifiée du 17 décembre 2010 concernant les organismes de placement collectifs (la “Loi de 2010”) et agréé en tant que gestionnaire de fonds d’investissement alternatifs conformément aux dispositions de la loi modifiée du 12 juillet 2013 relative aux gestionnaires de fonds d’investissement alternatifs. Cette amende administrative fait suite à un contrôle sur place auprès du GFI, réalisé entre le 19 juin 2023 et le 29 septembre 2023 et consacré aux aspects de gouvernance d’entreprise. Au cours du contrôle sur place la CSSF a identifié des violations répétées en matière de gouvernance interne du GFI, qui ont notamment porté sur les points suivants : 1. le GFI ne s’est pas conformé avec les principes généraux concernant les exigences organisationnelles telles qu’énoncées à l’article 109, paragraphe 1, lettre a) de la Loi de 2010 ; 2. le GFI n’a pas agi de manière honnête et équitable dans la conduite de ses activités, au mieux des intérêts des OPCVM gérés, conformément à l’article 111, lettre a) de la Loi de 2010 – et il n’a pas agi avec la compétence, le soin et la diligence qui s’imposent, au mieux des intérêts des OPCVM gérés, comme le prévoit l’article 111, lettre b) de la Loi de 2010 ; 3. le GFI n’a pas utilisé avec efficacité les ressources et les procédures nécessaire pour mener à bonne fin ses activités, comme le prévoit l’article 111, lettre c) de la Loi de 2010 ; 4. le GFI ne s’est pas efforcé d’écarter les conflits d’intérêts et n’a pas veillé à ce que les OPCVM qu’il gère soient traités équitablement, comme le prévoit l’article 111, lettre d) de la Loi de 2010. [original (French)] On 19 December 2024, the CSSF imposed an administrative fine of EUR 696,547 in total on the investment fund manager Funds Avenue S.A. (the “Manager”) subject to Chapter 15 of the amended Law of 17 December 2010 relating to undertakings for collective investment (the “Law of 2010”) and authorised as alternative investment fund manager according to the provisions of the amended Law of 12 July 2013 on alternative investment fund managers. This administrative fine is imposed following an on-site inspection on the Manager, carried out between 19 June 2023 and 29 September 2023 and which was focused on corporate governance aspects. During the on-site inspection the CSSF identified persistent breaches in the internal governance framework of the Manager which related in particular to the following points: 1. the Manager did not comply with the general principles surrounding organizational requirements as set out by Article 109(1)(a) of the Law of 2010 ; 2. the Manager failed to act honestly and fairly in conducting its business activities in the best interest of the managed UCITS as set out by Article 111(a) of the Law of 2010 and to act with due skill, care and diligence, in the best interest of the UCITS it manages as set out by Article 111(b) of the Law of 2010 ; 3. the Manager failed to employ efficiently the resources and procedures that are necessary for the proper performance of its business activities as set out by Article 111(c) of the Law of 2010 ; 4. the Manager did not try to avoid conflict of interests and failed to ensure that the UCITS it manages are fairly treated when conflicts of interests cannot be avoided as required by Article 111(d) of the Law of 2010.
- Document
- The publisher's document (https://registers.esma.europa.eu/publication/details?core=esma_registers_sanctions&docId=sn13720)
- Stated by
- ESMA Sanctions Register
- First recorded here
- 12 Sept 2026
- Listing id
- 13720
- In forceCommission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF)
UCITS
- In this state since
- 12 Sept 2026
- Designated
- 19 Dec 2024
- Reason given
- En date du 19 décembre 2024, la CSSF a prononcé une amende d’ordre d’un montant de 696.547 euros au total à l’encontre du gestionnaire de fonds d’investissement Funds Avenue S.A. (le “GFI”), soumis aux dispositions du chapitre 15 de la loi modifiée du 17 décembre 2010 concernant les organismes de placement collectifs (la “Loi de 2010”) et agréé en tant que gestionnaire de fonds d’investissement alternatifs conformément aux dispositions de la loi modifiée du 12 juillet 2013 relative aux gestionnaires de fonds d’investissement alternatifs. Cette amende administrative fait suite à un contrôle sur place auprès du GFI, réalisé entre le 19 juin 2023 et le 29 septembre 2023 et consacré aux aspects de gouvernance d’entreprise. Au cours du contrôle sur place la CSSF a identifié des violations répétées en matière de gouvernance interne du GFI, qui ont notamment porté sur les points suivants : 1. le GFI ne s’est pas conformé avec les principes généraux concernant les exigences organisationnelles telles qu’énoncées à l’article 109, paragraphe 1, lettre a) de la Loi de 2010 ; 2. le GFI n’a pas agi de manière honnête et équitable dans la conduite de ses activités, au mieux des intérêts des OPCVM gérés, conformément à l’article 111, lettre a) de la Loi de 2010 – et il n’a pas agi avec la compétence, le soin et la diligence qui s’imposent, au mieux des intérêts des OPCVM gérés, comme le prévoit l’article 111, lettre b) de la Loi de 2010 ; 3. le GFI n’a pas utilisé avec efficacité les ressources et les procédures nécessaire pour mener à bonne fin ses activités, comme le prévoit l’article 111, lettre c) de la Loi de 2010 ; 4. le GFI ne s’est pas efforcé d’écarter les conflits d’intérêts et n’a pas veillé à ce que les OPCVM qu’il gère soient traités équitablement, comme le prévoit l’article 111, lettre d) de la Loi de 2010. [original (French)] On 19 December 2024, the CSSF imposed an administrative fine of EUR 696,547 in total on the investment fund manager Funds Avenue S.A. (the “Manager”) subject to Chapter 15 of the amended Law of 17 December 2010 relating to undertakings for collective investment (the “Law of 2010”) and authorised as alternative investment fund manager according to the provisions of the amended Law of 12 July 2013 on alternative investment fund managers. This administrative fine is imposed following an on-site inspection on the Manager, carried out between 19 June 2023 and 29 September 2023 and which was focused on corporate governance aspects. During the on-site inspection the CSSF identified persistent breaches in the internal governance framework of the Manager which related in particular to the following points: 1. the Manager did not comply with the general principles surrounding organizational requirements as set out by Article 109(1)(a) of the Law of 2010 ; 2. the Manager failed to act honestly and fairly in conducting its business activities in the best interest of the managed UCITS as set out by Article 111(a) of the Law of 2010 and to act with due skill, care and diligence, in the best interest of the UCITS it manages as set out by Article 111(b) of the Law of 2010 ; 3. the Manager failed to employ efficiently the resources and procedures that are necessary for the proper performance of its business activities as set out by Article 111(c) of the Law of 2010 ; 4. the Manager did not try to avoid conflict of interests and failed to ensure that the UCITS it manages are fairly treated when conflicts of interests cannot be avoided as required by Article 111(d) of the Law of 2010.
- Document
- The publisher's document (https://registers.esma.europa.eu/publication/details?core=esma_registers_sanctions&docId=sn13720)
- Stated by
- ESMA Sanctions Register
- First recorded here
- 12 Sept 2026
- Listing id
- 13720
Ownership verdicts
No ownership verdict was on file for this company on 24 October 2026.
What was checked
As recorded by the assessment reading taken on 12 September 2026, 19:14 UTC, the newest on or before the date. Only “checked, not found” means a source was read in full and held nothing for the company.
Sanctions lists
Found · 1 source. The source holds records for this company.
- ESMA Sanctions Register, checked 12 Sept 2026
Where the company is registered or connected
LU: registered here
No company register for this jurisdiction has been connected to this system, and none has been examined. No register here states who owns its companies.
What this file cannot say
- Whether each listing was in force is rebuilt from what was recorded here: when it was first read, when a source stopped or resumed carrying it, and when its published term ended. A listing in force at an authority before this system first read it is shown from that first read.
- No ownership verdict is kept for this company. Verdicts are kept for companies registered where shareholders are read here: Estonia, Latvia and Poland.
What sources said
Legal name
funds avenue
ESMA Sanctions Register, since 12 Sept 2026, last confirmed by the date on 23 Oct 2026.
Jurisdiction
LU
ESMA Sanctions Register, since 12 Sept 2026, last confirmed by the date on 23 Oct 2026.
Versions of the sources
For each source behind this file, the newest read made on or before the date: the version of it that stood.
ESMA Sanctions Register
Read on 23 October 2026. No date from the publisher is read for this file, so its age is not known here. 845 records read.
The assessment reading
- Taken
- 12 September 2026, 19:14 UTC
- Methodology
- Version 4
- Level
- Medium
- Score recorded
- 65 of 100
- Digest
0c754bb47ccd72d32094798b3bd83588aa5b8a50A fingerprint of everything the reading says. The same reading always has this digest, and any change in it gives another.- Reading id
ae348447-b0d6-4904-a932-94fb4d1242f9
This file
- Address
- https://apolika.com/entities/d4a3d2bf-d7ab-43a5-a0dc-1cb66cef7138/evidence?as_of=2026-10-24The same address gives the same day's file tomorrow. What was recorded after the date is not in it.
- Made
- 24 October 2026, 19:52 UTC