Evidence file

DNB ASSET MANAGEMENT S.A.

What this system held and said about the company on 25 October 2026, as of the moment the file was made, and what it rested on. Made on 25 October 2026, 00:49 UTC.

Now
JSON
listing in force
1
ownership verdicts
0
source with its version
1
limits stated
2

Listings

  • LiftedCommission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF)

    Debarment

    In this state since
    12 Sept 2026
    Designated
    26 Mar 2024
    Reason given
    En date du 26 mars 2024, la CSSF a prononcé une sanction administrative à l’encontre du gestionnaire de fonds d’investissement DNB Asset Management S.A., radiée du Registre de Commerce et des Sociétés de Luxembourg le 26 juin 2024 (le “GFI”), soumis aux dispositions du chapitre 15 de la loi modifiée du 17 décembre 2010 concernant les organismes de placement collectifs (la “Loi de 2010”). La sanction administrative (imposée suite à un contrôle sur place effectué par la CSSF entre le 4 mars et 3 mai 2022 auprès du GFI) se compose de : (i) une déclaration publique imposée en application des dispositions de l’article 148, paragraphe 4, lettre a), lues conjointement avec l'article 148, paragraphe 2, lettres g), j) et k) pour le non-respect des dispositions de l’article 109, paragraphe 1, lettre a) concernant les obligations de bonne organisation administrative et de mécanismes de contrôle interne adéquats, des dispositions de l’article 110, paragraphe 1, lettre f) de la Loi de 2010 concernant la supervision des fonctions déléguées ainsi que des dispositions de l’article 111, lettre a) de la Loi de 2010 concernant l’obligation d’agir loyalement et équitablement au mieux des intérêts des organismes de placement collectif en valeurs mobilières (les “OPCVM”) qu’elle gère, de l’article 111, lettre b) de la Loi de 2010 concernant l’obligation des sociétés de gestion d’agir avec la compétence, le soin et la diligence qui s’imposent, au mieux des intérêts des OPCVM qu’elle gère et de l’article 111, lettre c) de la Loi de 2010 concernant les obligations des sociétés de gestion d’avoir et d’utiliser avec efficacité les ressources et les procédures nécessaires pour mener à bonne fin ses activités; et (ii) un blâme imposé à l’encontre du GFI en application des dispositions de l’article 3, paragraphe 3, point 2 et l’article 3, paragraphe 1, point 1 de la loi du 15 mars 2016 relative aux produits dérivés de gré à gré, aux contreparties centrales et aux référentiels centraux et modifiant différentes lois relatives aux services financiers, lues conjointement avec les dispositions de l’article 9, paragraphe 1ter. du Règlement (UE) No 648/2012 du Parlement Européen et du Conseil du 4 juillet 2012, tel que modifié, sur les produits dérivés de gré à gré, les contreparties centrales et les référentiels centraux (le “Règlement EMIR”), parce que le GFI n’a pas agi conformément à l’obligation de reporting telle qu’énoncée à l’article 3, paragraphe 1, point 1 de la Loi du 15 mars 2016, lue conjointement avec l’article 9, point 1ter du Règlement EMIR. [original (French)] On 26 March 2024, the CSSF imposed an administrative sanction on the investment fund manager DNB Asset Management S.A., deleted from the Luxembourg Trade and Company Register on 26 June 2024 (the “Manager”), subject to Chapter 15 of the amended Law of 17 December 2010 relating to undertakings for collective investment (the “Law of 2010”). The administrative sanction (imposed following an on-site inspection carried out by the CSSF on the Manager between 4 March and 3 May 2022) is composed of: (i) a public statement imposed pursuant to Article 148(4)(a) read together with Article 148(2)(g), Article 148(2)(j) and Article 148(2)(k) of the Law of 2010 for failure to comply with the provisions of Article 109(1)(a) regarding the requirements to have sound administrative procedures and adequate internal control mechanisms, the provisions of Article 110(1)(f) regarding the supervision of delegates and the provisions of Article 111(a) of the Law of 2010 regarding the obligation to act honestly and fairly in conducting its business activities in the best interests of the managed undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (the “UCITS”), Article 111(b) of the Law of 2010 regarding the obligation to act diligently in the best interest of the managed UCITS and Article 111(c) of the Law of 2010 regarding the obligation to have and employ efficiently the resources and procedures that are necessary for the proper performance of business activities; and (ii) a reprimand imposed pursuant to Article 3(3) point 2 and Article 3(1) point 1 of the Law of 15 March 2016 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories, as amended (the “Law of 15 March 2016”) read together with the provisions of Article 9 point 1b. of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories known as the European Market Infrastructure Regulation, as amended (the “EMIR Regulation”), because the Manager failed to act in accordance with the reporting obligations as set out in Article 3(1) point 1 of the Law of 15 March 2016 read together with Article 9 point 1b. of the EMIR Regulation.
    Document
    The publisher's document
    Stated by
    ESMA Sanctions Register
    First recorded here
    12 Sept 2026
    Listing id
    13255
  • In forceCommission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF)

    UCITS

    In this state since
    12 Sept 2026
    Designated
    26 Mar 2024
    Reason given
    En date du 26 mars 2024, la CSSF a prononcé une sanction administrative à l’encontre du gestionnaire de fonds d’investissement DNB Asset Management S.A., radiée du Registre de Commerce et des Sociétés de Luxembourg le 26 juin 2024 (le “GFI”), soumis aux dispositions du chapitre 15 de la loi modifiée du 17 décembre 2010 concernant les organismes de placement collectifs (la “Loi de 2010”). La sanction administrative (imposée suite à un contrôle sur place effectué par la CSSF entre le 4 mars et 3 mai 2022 auprès du GFI) se compose de : (i) une déclaration publique imposée en application des dispositions de l’article 148, paragraphe 4, lettre a), lues conjointement avec l'article 148, paragraphe 2, lettres g), j) et k) pour le non-respect des dispositions de l’article 109, paragraphe 1, lettre a) concernant les obligations de bonne organisation administrative et de mécanismes de contrôle interne adéquats, des dispositions de l’article 110, paragraphe 1, lettre f) de la Loi de 2010 concernant la supervision des fonctions déléguées ainsi que des dispositions de l’article 111, lettre a) de la Loi de 2010 concernant l’obligation d’agir loyalement et équitablement au mieux des intérêts des organismes de placement collectif en valeurs mobilières (les “OPCVM”) qu’elle gère, de l’article 111, lettre b) de la Loi de 2010 concernant l’obligation des sociétés de gestion d’agir avec la compétence, le soin et la diligence qui s’imposent, au mieux des intérêts des OPCVM qu’elle gère et de l’article 111, lettre c) de la Loi de 2010 concernant les obligations des sociétés de gestion d’avoir et d’utiliser avec efficacité les ressources et les procédures nécessaires pour mener à bonne fin ses activités; et (ii) un blâme imposé à l’encontre du GFI en application des dispositions de l’article 3, paragraphe 3, point 2 et l’article 3, paragraphe 1, point 1 de la loi du 15 mars 2016 relative aux produits dérivés de gré à gré, aux contreparties centrales et aux référentiels centraux et modifiant différentes lois relatives aux services financiers, lues conjointement avec les dispositions de l’article 9, paragraphe 1ter. du Règlement (UE) No 648/2012 du Parlement Européen et du Conseil du 4 juillet 2012, tel que modifié, sur les produits dérivés de gré à gré, les contreparties centrales et les référentiels centraux (le “Règlement EMIR”), parce que le GFI n’a pas agi conformément à l’obligation de reporting telle qu’énoncée à l’article 3, paragraphe 1, point 1 de la Loi du 15 mars 2016, lue conjointement avec l’article 9, point 1ter du Règlement EMIR. [original (French)] On 26 March 2024, the CSSF imposed an administrative sanction on the investment fund manager DNB Asset Management S.A., deleted from the Luxembourg Trade and Company Register on 26 June 2024 (the “Manager”), subject to Chapter 15 of the amended Law of 17 December 2010 relating to undertakings for collective investment (the “Law of 2010”). The administrative sanction (imposed following an on-site inspection carried out by the CSSF on the Manager between 4 March and 3 May 2022) is composed of: (i) a public statement imposed pursuant to Article 148(4)(a) read together with Article 148(2)(g), Article 148(2)(j) and Article 148(2)(k) of the Law of 2010 for failure to comply with the provisions of Article 109(1)(a) regarding the requirements to have sound administrative procedures and adequate internal control mechanisms, the provisions of Article 110(1)(f) regarding the supervision of delegates and the provisions of Article 111(a) of the Law of 2010 regarding the obligation to act honestly and fairly in conducting its business activities in the best interests of the managed undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (the “UCITS”), Article 111(b) of the Law of 2010 regarding the obligation to act diligently in the best interest of the managed UCITS and Article 111(c) of the Law of 2010 regarding the obligation to have and employ efficiently the resources and procedures that are necessary for the proper performance of business activities; and (ii) a reprimand imposed pursuant to Article 3(3) point 2 and Article 3(1) point 1 of the Law of 15 March 2016 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories, as amended (the “Law of 15 March 2016”) read together with the provisions of Article 9 point 1b. of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories known as the European Market Infrastructure Regulation, as amended (the “EMIR Regulation”), because the Manager failed to act in accordance with the reporting obligations as set out in Article 3(1) point 1 of the Law of 15 March 2016 read together with Article 9 point 1b. of the EMIR Regulation.
    Document
    The publisher's document
    Stated by
    ESMA Sanctions Register
    First recorded here
    12 Sept 2026
    Listing id
    13255

Ownership verdicts

No ownership verdict was on file for this company on 25 October 2026.

What was checked

As recorded by the assessment reading taken on 12 September 2026, 19:15 UTC, the newest on or before the date. Only “checked, not found” means a source was read in full and held nothing for the company.

Sanctions lists

Found · 1 source. The source holds records for this company.

  • ESMA Sanctions Register, checked 12 Sept 2026

Where the company is registered or connected

  • LU: registered here

    No company register for this jurisdiction has been connected to this system, and none has been examined. No register here states who owns its companies.

What this file cannot say

  • Whether each listing was in force is rebuilt from what was recorded here: when it was first read, when a source stopped or resumed carrying it, and when its published term ended. A listing in force at an authority before this system first read it is shown from that first read.
  • No ownership verdict is kept for this company. Verdicts are kept for companies registered where shareholders are read here: Estonia, Latvia and Poland.

What sources said

Legal name

Registered identifier

Jurisdiction

Versions of the sources

For each source behind this file, the newest read made on or before the date: the version of it that stood.

  • ESMA Sanctions Register

    Read on 23 October 2026. No date from the publisher is read for this file, so its age is not known here. 845 records read.

The assessment reading

Taken
12 September 2026, 19:15 UTC
Methodology
Version 4
Level
Medium
Score recorded
65 of 100
Digest
2b81c1651b97fbd6f2698ac44783ca23024021ebA fingerprint of everything the reading says. The same reading always has this digest, and any change in it gives another.
Reading id
328cbb8f-ad17-45a0-ad2b-edc10b16f0d7

This file

Address
https://apolika.com/entities/9374a1b4-c225-4906-b7e8-df397dbe5954/evidence?as_of=2026-10-25The same address gives the same day's file tomorrow. What was recorded after the date is not in it.
Made
25 October 2026, 00:49 UTC